Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release/9.0] [mono] Fix swizzle_mask type #107602

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 16, 2024

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Sep 10, 2024

Backport of #107460 to release/9.0

/cc @lambdageek @radekdoulik

Customer Impact

  • Customer reported
  • Found internally

When working though llvm issues it was discovered that the wrong llvm type was used when constructing the Wasm SIMD intrinsic swizzle mask. The fixes a correctness issue that would otherwise appear when working with llvm

Regression

  • Yes
  • No

[If yes, specify when the regression was introduced. Provide the PR or commit if known.]

Testing

[How was the fix verified? How was the issue missed previously? What tests were added?]

Risk

Low

That was catched by llvm debug asserts, the mask should be vector of 16 int8
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @lambdageek, @steveisok
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@lewing lewing added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 10, 2024
@jeffschwMSFT
Copy link
Member

@lewing can we get the template filled in?

@lewing lewing removed the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 12, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved. we can merge when ready

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Sep 12, 2024
@jeffschwMSFT
Copy link
Member

@lewing please take a look at the PR failures

@jeffschwMSFT
Copy link
Member

@lewing @radekdoulik today is the snap, please take a look at the PR failures

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT removed the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Sep 16, 2024
@lewing lewing added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Sep 16, 2024
@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented Sep 16, 2024

/ba-g BA is red because this is a release branch, failures are known

@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented Sep 16, 2024

@jeffschwMSFT both this and the other look fine now

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT merged commit 3de60e8 into release/9.0 Sep 16, 2024
10 checks passed
@jkotas jkotas deleted the backport/pr-107460-to-release/9.0 branch September 18, 2024 21:31
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 19, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-Codegen-LLVM-mono Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants