Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add regression test for GitHub issue #74132 #91009

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

trylek
Copy link
Member

@trylek trylek commented Aug 23, 2023

I have verified locally that the problem described in the issue no longer exists in .NET 8 RC1, the bug was probably fixed earlier this year by David Wrighton. I think the regression test described in the issue is useful so I'm proposing to merge it in; this PR will then close the issue.

Fixes: #74132

Thanks

Tomas

I have verified locally that the problem described in the issue
no longer exists in .NET 8 RC1, the bug was probably fixed earlier
this year by David Wrighton. I think the regression test described
in the issue is useful so I'm proposing to merge it in; this PR
will then close the issue.

Fixes: dotnet#74132

Thanks

Tomas
@trylek trylek added this to the 9.0.0 milestone Aug 23, 2023
@trylek trylek requested a review from ivdiazsa August 23, 2023 19:24
@ghost ghost assigned trylek Aug 23, 2023
@ivdiazsa
Copy link
Member

I assume the specific-issue regression tests will remain in the old testing system? As in, the executable directly rather than the Fact/Theory thingies?


using System;

// This regression test tracks the issue where GetInterfaceMap returns incorrect
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is regression test for a BCL API behavior. It would be more appropriate to add it under src\libraries, similar to #90518 - if this case is not covered by the tests being added already.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, thanks for pointing that out, in such case I'll abandon this PR and I'll follow up on the #90518 PR thread.

@trylek
Copy link
Member Author

trylek commented Aug 23, 2023

Closing per JanK's PR feedback.

@trylek trylek closed this Aug 23, 2023
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
3 participants