-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Specialize pre-closing checks for engine implementations #38702
Conversation
Pinging @elastic/es-distributed |
x-pack/plugin/ccr/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ccr/CloseFollowerIndexIT.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've left three smaller comments on naming and structure, looking good o.w.
...java/org/elasticsearch/action/admin/indices/close/TransportVerifyShardBeforeCloseAction.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/index/engine/InternalEngine.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/index/engine/InternalEngine.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Thanks @ywelsch - I've applied your feedback. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
x-pack/plugin/ccr/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/ccr/CloseFollowerIndexIT.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Thanks @ywelsch and @martijnvg |
The Close Index API has been refactored in 6.7.0 and it now performs pre-closing sanity checks on shards before an index is closed: the maximum sequence number must be equals to the global checkpoint. While this is a strong requirement for regular shards, we identified the need to relax this check in the case of CCR following shards. The following shards are not in charge of managing the max sequence number or global checkpoint, which are pulled from a leader shard. They also fetch and process batches of operations from the leader in an unordered way, potentially leaving gaps in the history of ops. If the following shard lags a lot it's possible that the global checkpoint and max seq number never get in sync, preventing the following shard to be closed and a new PUT Follow action to be issued on this shard (which is our recommended way to resume/restart a CCR following). This commit allows each Engine implementation to define the specific verification it must perform before closing the index. In order to allow following/frozen/closed shards to be closed whatever the max seq number or global checkpoint are, the FollowingEngine and ReadOnlyEngine do not perform any check before the index is closed. Co-authored-by: Martijn van Groningen <martijn.v.groningen@gmail.com>
The Close Index API has been refactored in 6.7.0 and it now performs pre-closing sanity checks on shards before an index is closed: the maximum sequence number must be equals to the global checkpoint. While this is a strong requirement for regular shards, we identified the need to relax this check in the case of CCR following shards. The following shards are not in charge of managing the max sequence number or global checkpoint, which are pulled from a leader shard. They also fetch and process batches of operations from the leader in an unordered way, potentially leaving gaps in the history of ops. If the following shard lags a lot it's possible that the global checkpoint and max seq number never get in sync, preventing the following shard to be closed and a new PUT Follow action to be issued on this shard (which is our recommended way to resume/restart a CCR following). This commit allows each Engine implementation to define the specific verification it must perform before closing the index. In order to allow following/frozen/closed shards to be closed whatever the max seq number or global checkpoint are, the FollowingEngine and ReadOnlyEngine do not perform any check before the index is closed. Co-authored-by: Martijn van Groningen <martijn.v.groningen@gmail.com>
The Close Index API has been refactored in 6.7.0 and it now performs pre-closing sanity checks on shards before an index is closed: the maximum sequence number must be equals to the global checkpoint. While this is a strong requirement for regular shards, we identified the need to relax this check in the case of CCR following shards. The following shards are not in charge of managing the max sequence number or global checkpoint, which are pulled from a leader shard. They also fetch and process batches of operations from the leader in an unordered way, potentially leaving gaps in the history of ops. If the following shard lags a lot it's possible that the global checkpoint and max seq number never get in sync, preventing the following shard to be closed and a new PUT Follow action to be issued on this shard (which is our recommended way to resume/restart a CCR following). This commit allows each Engine implementation to define the specific verification it must perform before closing the index. In order to allow following/frozen/closed shards to be closed whatever the max seq number or global checkpoint are, the FollowingEngine and ReadOnlyEngine do not perform any check before the index is closed. Co-authored-by: Martijn van Groningen <martijn.v.groningen@gmail.com>
…8722) The Close Index API has been refactored in 6.7.0 and it now performs pre-closing sanity checks on shards before an index is closed: the maximum sequence number must be equals to the global checkpoint. While this is a strong requirement for regular shards, we identified the need to relax this check in the case of CCR following shards. The following shards are not in charge of managing the max sequence number or global checkpoint, which are pulled from a leader shard. They also fetch and process batches of operations from the leader in an unordered way, potentially leaving gaps in the history of ops. If the following shard lags a lot it's possible that the global checkpoint and max seq number never get in sync, preventing the following shard to be closed and a new PUT Follow action to be issued on this shard (which is our recommended way to resume/restart a CCR following). This commit allows each Engine implementation to define the specific verification it must perform before closing the index. In order to allow following/frozen/closed shards to be closed whatever the max seq number or global checkpoint are, the FollowingEngine and ReadOnlyEngine do not perform any check before the index is closed. Co-authored-by: Martijn van Groningen <martijn.v.groningen@gmail.com>
…8723) The Close Index API has been refactored in 6.7.0 and it now performs pre-closing sanity checks on shards before an index is closed: the maximum sequence number must be equals to the global checkpoint. While this is a strong requirement for regular shards, we identified the need to relax this check in the case of CCR following shards. The following shards are not in charge of managing the max sequence number or global checkpoint, which are pulled from a leader shard. They also fetch and process batches of operations from the leader in an unordered way, potentially leaving gaps in the history of ops. If the following shard lags a lot it's possible that the global checkpoint and max seq number never get in sync, preventing the following shard to be closed and a new PUT Follow action to be issued on this shard (which is our recommended way to resume/restart a CCR following). This commit allows each Engine implementation to define the specific verification it must perform before closing the index. In order to allow following/frozen/closed shards to be closed whatever the max seq number or global checkpoint are, the FollowingEngine and ReadOnlyEngine do not perform any check before the index is closed. Co-authored-by: Martijn van Groningen <martijn.v.groningen@gmail.com>
…8727) The Close Index API has been refactored in 6.7.0 and it now performs pre-closing sanity checks on shards before an index is closed: the maximum sequence number must be equals to the global checkpoint. While this is a strong requirement for regular shards, we identified the need to relax this check in the case of CCR following shards. The following shards are not in charge of managing the max sequence number or global checkpoint, which are pulled from a leader shard. They also fetch and process batches of operations from the leader in an unordered way, potentially leaving gaps in the history of ops. If the following shard lags a lot it's possible that the global checkpoint and max seq number never get in sync, preventing the following shard to be closed and a new PUT Follow action to be issued on this shard (which is our recommended way to resume/restart a CCR following). This commit allows each Engine implementation to define the specific verification it must perform before closing the index. In order to allow following/frozen/closed shards to be closed whatever the max seq number or global checkpoint are, the FollowingEngine and ReadOnlyEngine do not perform any check before the index is closed. Co-authored-by: Martijn van Groningen <martijn.v.groningen@gmail.com> This commit also contains #37426. Related #33888
Now the test `CloseFollowerIndexIT` has been added in #38702, it needs to be adapted for replicated closed indices. The test closes the follower index which is lagging behind the leader index. When it's closed, no sanity checks are executed because it's a follower index (this is a consequence of #38702). But with replicated closed indices, the index is reinitialized as a closed index with a `NoOpEngine` and such engines make strong assertions on the values of the maximum sequence number and the global checkpoint. Since the values do not match, the shards cannot be created and fail and the cluster health turns RED. This commit adapts the `CloseFollowerIndexIT` test so that it wraps the default `UncaughtExceptionHandler` with a handler that tolerates any exception thrown by `ReadOnlyEngine.assertMaxSeqNoEqualsToGlobalCheckpoint()`. Replacing the default uncaught exception handler requires specific permissions, and instead of creating another gradle project it duplicates the `internalClusterTest` task to make it work without security manager for this specific test only. Relates to #33888
Now the test `CloseFollowerIndexIT` has been added in elastic#38702, it needs to be adapted for replicated closed indices. The test closes the follower index which is lagging behind the leader index. When it's closed, no sanity checks are executed because it's a follower index (this is a consequence of elastic#38702). But with replicated closed indices, the index is reinitialized as a closed index with a `NoOpEngine` and such engines make strong assertions on the values of the maximum sequence number and the global checkpoint. Since the values do not match, the shards cannot be created and fail and the cluster health turns RED. This commit adapts the `CloseFollowerIndexIT` test so that it wraps the default `UncaughtExceptionHandler` with a handler that tolerates any exception thrown by `ReadOnlyEngine.assertMaxSeqNoEqualsToGlobalCheckpoint()`. Replacing the default uncaught exception handler requires specific permissions, and instead of creating another gradle project it duplicates the `internalClusterTest` task to make it work without security manager for this specific test only. Relates to elastic#33888
This pull request allows engine implementations to perform specialized sanity checks during the closing of index shards.
Co-authored-by: Martijn van Groningen <martijn.v.groningen@**.com>