Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Endpoint] EMT-issue-65: add endpoint list api #53861

Merged

Conversation

nnamdifrankie
Copy link
Contributor

@nnamdifrankie nnamdifrankie commented Dec 31, 2019

Summary

Summarize your PR. If it involves visual changes include a screenshot or gif.

This PR enables the api to retrieve the list of endpoints from the elastic search backend. It collapses the all the records received for all endpoints to to their latest record. It maps the data to a simplified data structure. This PR only handles the list return, the details api will be handled in another PR.

Screen Shot 2020-01-02 at 11 50 09 AM

Checklist

Use strikethroughs to remove checklist items you don't feel are applicable to this PR.

- [ ] This was checked for cross-browser compatibility, including a check against IE11
- [ ] Any text added follows EUI's writing guidelines, uses sentence case text and includes i18n support
- [ ] Documentation was added for features that require explanation or tutorials

For maintainers

- [ ] This was checked for breaking API changes and was labeled appropriately
- [ ] This includes a feature addition or change that requires a release note and was labeled appropriately

@nnamdifrankie nnamdifrankie added release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes v7.6.0 v8.0.0 labels Jan 2, 2020
@nnamdifrankie
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elasticmachine merge upstream

export const EndpointConfigSchema = schema.object({
enabled: schema.boolean({ defaultValue: false }),
searchResultDefaultFirstPageIndex: schema.number({ defaultValue: 0 }),
searchResultDefaultPageSize: schema.number({ defaultValue: 10 }),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

different "entities" may want different default page sizes, such as alerts, investigations, etc.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point


export const config = {
schema: schema.object({ enabled: schema.boolean({ defaultValue: false }) }),
schema: EndpointConfigSchema,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good idea putting this into a separate file

id: string;
};
sensor: {
persistence: true;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be boolean?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

typos

updated_at?: Date;
};
isolation: {
status: false;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be boolean?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you can have an isolated endpoint right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

typos

},
from: paging.pageIndex * paging.pageSize,
size: paging.pageSize,
index: 'endpoint-agent*',
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be configurable somehow?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@nnamdifrankie nnamdifrankie Jan 2, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be configurable somehow?

I think we should make it conventional for now and agree what it will be called, if we make it configurable a lot of systems will have to change every time someone changes this value. fleet, endpoint generator etc. I can make it a constant.

return {
body: {
query: this.queryBody(),
collapse: {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why collapse? Can you leave a comment?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@nnamdifrankie nnamdifrankie Jan 2, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why collapse? Can you leave a comment?

We are technically aggregating by endpoint machine id and retrieving the latest of each group of events related to an endpoint by machine id. The collapse does this.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good, can you just paste this in the source as well?

},
options: { authRequired: true },
},
async (context, req, res) => {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Question/DIscussion: What are the pros for using an anonymous function like this? I definitely prefer having functions named for readability purposes.

This isn't too bad because you're passing in router and only one route is being added at once, but when there are multiple routes being added it's quite hard to read IMHO.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This isn't too bad because you're passing in router and only one route is being added at once, but when there are multiple routes being added it's quite hard to read IMHO.

This handler function is only related to this route so there is the documentation. In this case I think the name may be redundant.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI: personally, I also like the naming on the function. One drawback of anonymous functions is debugging where you just see "anonymous" in stack traces or when doing heap/cpu profiling (but perhaps we don't do much of that, so its ok)

expect(endpointResultList.requestPageSize).toEqual(10);
});

it('test find the latest of all endpoints with params', async () => {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we add a test with negative numbers/floats? Or does the schema enforce this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we add a test with negative numbers/floats? Or does the schema enforce this?

We can enforce it in the schema.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nnamdifrankie are we enforcing it or are you saying we could?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

private readonly request: KibanaRequest<any, any, any>;
private readonly endpointAppContext: EndpointAppContext;

constructor(request: KibanaRequest<any, any, any>, endpointAppContext: EndpointAppContext) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: I think this could be shortened to:

constructor(private readonly request: KibanaRequest<any, any, any>, private readonly endpointAppContext: EndpointAppContext) {}

and you could remove these lines:

  private readonly request: KibanaRequest<any, any, any>;
  private readonly endpointAppContext: EndpointAppContext;

};
}

async paging() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: maybe make this private async paging()

@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
/*
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be worth creating an integration test to make sure the ES query works against real data in ES? I believe these tests just mock ES out correct?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be worth creating an integration test to make sure the ES query works against real data in ES? I believe these tests just mock ES out correct?

I will add the integration test, but it is not going to replace the Unit test. They are both needed.

},
async (context, req, res) => {
try {
const queryParams = await new AllEndpointsQueryBuilder(
Copy link
Contributor

@bkimmel bkimmel Jan 2, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure what the best way to resolve this is (pun intended!), but I think if any one of AllEndpointsQueryBuilder, .callAsCurrentUser, or mapToEndpointResultList doesn't resolve, the catch won't fire (so neither res.ok or res.internalError will get called) and this will lock up. Also, errors thrown inside those functions won't make it out to this catch (I think) (it does bubble through the await). Maybe put it inside a Promise.race() with some kind of timeout?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@nnamdifrankie nnamdifrankie Jan 2, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(it does bubble through the await)

This is the expected behavior.

There is no reason that I see why they will not resolve, the client call is a rest call that eventually timeouts and fails. The other reads the config to get the default paging, am not sure if this is an issue.

import { Observable } from 'rxjs';
import { PluginInitializerContext } from 'kibana/server';

export type EndpointConfigType = ReturnType<typeof createConfig$> extends Observable<infer P>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would you explain this? If I'm understanding this correctly, createConfig$ always returns a value that extends Observable, so the second part of this expression is unused.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
/*
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would this test be better as an API integration test? It could load an archvie (via es_archiver) and instrument the route handler and ES. This would check that the routing works and that the query works. Also it wouldn't require writing any mocking.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would this test be better as an API integration test? It could load an archvie (via es_archiver) and instrument the route handler and ES. This would check that the routing works and that the query works. Also it wouldn't require writing any mocking.

We still need a unit test. We have an api test too but I did not want to add it to this PR to blow it up. I can add it to another PR. But I can add it if you insist.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you explain why you still need a unit tests? My understanding is that this test mocks various internals and asserts that they were called. My concern is that this type of test doesn't check the behavior. I'm also concerned that since its completely coupled to internals, it might break even if the behavior is correct.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@nnamdifrankie nnamdifrankie Jan 2, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you explain why you still need a unit tests? My understanding is that this test mocks various internals and asserts that they were called

This is what unit tests do, they test internals and expected calls on dependencies with stubs. We cannot defer all tests after the entire system is coupled together and started, without covering the units.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adding the integration test. I agree that mocking can cause tight coupling and personally regret the places I did it in the SMP. I can see the value in stubbing out ES so you can test the translation from the search results of endpoints into the returned format done by this function mapToEndpointResultList. My suggestion (only a suggestion) would be to leave out the expects for how a function is called and how many times it is called. Like these lines:
expect(mockScopedClient.callAsCurrentUser).toBeCalledWith('search', {
const endpointResultList = mockResponse.ok.mock.calls[0][0]?.body as EndpointResultList;

and instead just validate that the results get transformed into the expected format like you're already doing.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on @jonathan-buttner's comment, I'm wondering if this could be replaced by one (or more) unit tests against a pure function called mapToEndpointResultList. This function could be responsible for any intricate business logic and could be tested without stubs/mocking.

A second set of API integration tests could instrument the vertical slice but with much less coverage. This approach might allow your tests to be less coupled to the implementation while also having no mocking/stubs.

I'm also arguing that unit tests don't necessarily require mocking. Here is the PR I'm working on: https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/53619/files

Here are my unit test files. These do not use mocks/stubs and they also test the behavior of a small unit:

My integration / functional tests will instrument all of the 'plumbing' that is responsible for setting up react, redux, etc. Those tests will have less coverage (they will no instrument all the branches instrumented by the unit tests.)

}

export class EndpointAppConstants {
static ENDPOINT_INDEX_NAME = 'endpoint-agent*';
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

perhaps the string 'endpoint-agent*' could just be in a const variable (as opposed to a public member in a class) outside of this types module.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@nnamdifrankie nnamdifrankie Jan 2, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

perhaps the string 'endpoint-agent*' could just be in a const variable (as opposed to a public member in a class) outside of this types module.

The reason is that the bootstrap also uses this value, so I wanted to put it somewhere shared. If that is fine.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nnamdifrankie was this decided somewhere - since this is going to master shouldn't this be more finalized?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mockedEndpointPluginSetupDependencies = { features: mockedPluginSetupContract };
});

it('test properly setup plugin', async () => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My understanding of this test is that it should check that a feature has been registered and that routes have been registered. If these behaviors were tested via API integration tests, we could test the behavior instead of checking that certain methods were called. The tests wouldn't be as coupled to the implementation details. It also wouldn't requiring writing mocks that are specific to the new platform implementation (which has been changing very frequently recently.)

How would you feel about writing an API integration test that calls one of our HTTP APIs. You could also write a test that creates a user with a certain role and then with that user checks that feature registration is working correctly by making API requests (or by asserting that elements are present in the UI.)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

requiring writing mocks that are specific to the new platform implementation (which has been changing very frequently recently.)

This is actually a reason to write such test, to make it clear that the dependencies in the code are covered at a minimum. You want to detect when you code is affected by other code changes. I will add integration test.

path: '/api/endpoint/endpoints',
validate: {
query: schema.object({
pageSize: schema.number({ defaultValue: 10, min: 1 }),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could you add comments explaining pageSize and pageIndex somewhere?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can add that, thought it was self explanatory.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nnamdifrankie is there an upper limit on the number of endpoints you can request in the payload?

import { KibanaRequest } from 'kibana/server';
import { EndpointAppConstants, EndpointAppContext } from '../../types';

export class AllEndpointsQueryBuilder {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The paging method is only used in this class. Perhaps it would be better to make it private? Also, this class has only one method used outside of this module: toQueryParams. Since this isn't modeling an entity, and since it isn't inheriting anything, perhaps it could be changed into a function. The function could be called allEndpointsQueryParams. It could take the same arguments at the constructor currently does.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated the private, will leave it as a class for now as we have more querying functionality from our POC effort.

config: () => Promise.resolve(EndpointConfigSchema.validate({})),
});
const query = await searchQueryBuilder.toQueryParams();
expect(query).toEqual({
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would you explain the purpose of this test?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

update the test describe

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the confusion. Could you explain what you hope to accomplish by having this test? It seems to just check the return value of a function: https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/53861/files/6327a4fbdde17b600f8d68d0e721e9f676f6f066#diff-0ab9ae9ab2c5fdf664d3779d6058b9a1R20

Copy link
Contributor Author

@nnamdifrankie nnamdifrankie Jan 6, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To get the collapsed list of endpoint, we have a particular query that has to be built. We are testing that the query is created as expected with certain attributes.

): EndpointResultList {
if (searchResponse.hits.hits.length > 0) {
return {
requestPageSize: queryParams.size as number,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would you explain why you are casting values in this function? Thanks

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It fails on type check hence it was cast.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think since queryParams is typed as Record<string, unknown>, the type system doesn't understand that queryParams.size is a number. Maybe you could try changing that type to queryParams: { size: number, from: number }. This function relies on those values being numbers, so the type could reflect that.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

turn out it was not needed, but in case you are wondering why it is typed as such https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/master/src/core/server/elasticsearch/scoped_cluster_client.ts#L67. I changed it to Record<string, any> which is the type of the for the client call

@nnamdifrankie
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elasticmachine merge upstream

Copy link
Contributor

@jonathan-buttner jonathan-buttner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adding the integration test!

@nnamdifrankie
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elasticmachine merge upstream

static ENDPOINT_INDEX_NAME = 'endpoint-agent*';
}

export interface EndpointData {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a handful of these fields will likely be dropped for the first release

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we will probably just need something similar to machine_id, the items under host, perhaps active_directory, policy

We can remove some items in another PR, but we likely won't be supplying all of this to start

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let talk and agree and we can remove in the next go around.

status?: string;
updated_at?: Date;
};
isolation: {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

likely, no isolation data for first release

is_base_image: boolean;
active_directory_distinguished_name: string;
active_directory_hostname: string;
upgrade: {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

like no upgrade for first release

Copy link

@james-elastic james-elastic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

comments and requesting some non happy path tests for the API

expect(endpointResultList.requestPageSize).toEqual(10);
});

it('test find the latest of all endpoints with params', async () => {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nnamdifrankie are we enforcing it or are you saying we could?

path: '/api/endpoint/endpoints',
validate: {
query: schema.object({
pageSize: schema.number({ defaultValue: 10, min: 1 }),

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nnamdifrankie is there an upper limit on the number of endpoints you can request in the payload?

}

export class EndpointAppConstants {
static ENDPOINT_INDEX_NAME = 'endpoint-agent*';

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nnamdifrankie was this decided somewhere - since this is going to master shouldn't this be more finalized?

import { FtrProviderContext } from '../../ftr_provider_context';

export default function({ getService }: FtrProviderContext) {
const esArchiver = getService('esArchiver');

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nnamdifrankie there are a lot of happy path tests, can you add some non happy path tests?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@james-elastic

is there an upper limit on the number of endpoints you can request in the payload?

the upper limit is bounded by elastic search which is 10000, I can add that.

was this decided somewhere - since this is going to master shouldn't this be more finalized?

We derived it from the work we did with @jonathan-buttner on the POC, so we are rolling with that.

there are a lot of happy path tests, can you add some non happy path tests?

There is not a lot of unhappy paths because there are no user inputs except for the page sizes which also has defaults if not provided. I will try to add a failure case somewhere.

@nnamdifrankie
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elasticmachine merge upstream

Copy link

@james-elastic james-elastic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the updates and changes!

@nnamdifrankie nnamdifrankie merged commit 6a2fb61 into elastic:master Jan 7, 2020
@nnamdifrankie nnamdifrankie deleted the emt-issue-65_add-endpoint_list_api branch January 7, 2020 15:02
jloleysens added a commit to jloleysens/kibana that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2020
…le-saved-objects

* 'master' of github.com:elastic/kibana: (86 commits)
  [Uptime] Added date range filter into expanded list query (elastic#52609)
  [SIEM] Add react/display-name eslint rule (elastic#53107)
  [SIEM] Enable eslint prefer-template rule (elastic#53983)
  Elasticsearch snapshots automation (elastic#53706)
  [SIEM] Enable eslint react/no-children-prop (elastic#53985)
  [DOCS][Reporting] Adds info about using a custom reporting index (elastic#54052)
  Changing background color to align with EUI color (elastic#54060)
  Fix linting issues (elastic#54068)
  NP Migration: Move doc views registry and existing doc views into discover plugin (elastic#53465)
  [ML] DF Analytics job creation: Add 'excludes' input field to form (elastic#53856)
  EMT-issue-65: add endpoint list api (elastic#53861)
  [SIEM] Fix doubled drag handles in Timeline (elastic#52679)
  Functional tests: refactor visualize_page (elastic#53845)
  [Dashboard] Redesign empty screen in readonly mode (elastic#54073)
  [ML] Support search for partitions on Single Metric Viewer (elastic#53879)
  update apm index pattern (elastic#54095)
  Add data ui for envoyproxy Metricbeat Module (elastic#53476)
  [ML] persist the brush when expanded to full width (elastic#54020)
  Skip failing test (elastic#54100)
  [APM] Show errors on the timeline instead of under the transaction (elastic#53756)
  ...

# Conflicts:
#	src/legacy/core_plugins/console/public/np_ready/application/contexts/services_context.tsx
#	src/legacy/core_plugins/console/public/np_ready/application/index.tsx
jloleysens added a commit to jloleysens/kibana that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2020
…/kibana into feature/console-saved-objects

* 'feature/console-saved-objects' of github.com:jloleysens/kibana: (86 commits)
  [Uptime] Added date range filter into expanded list query (elastic#52609)
  [SIEM] Add react/display-name eslint rule (elastic#53107)
  [SIEM] Enable eslint prefer-template rule (elastic#53983)
  Elasticsearch snapshots automation (elastic#53706)
  [SIEM] Enable eslint react/no-children-prop (elastic#53985)
  [DOCS][Reporting] Adds info about using a custom reporting index (elastic#54052)
  Changing background color to align with EUI color (elastic#54060)
  Fix linting issues (elastic#54068)
  NP Migration: Move doc views registry and existing doc views into discover plugin (elastic#53465)
  [ML] DF Analytics job creation: Add 'excludes' input field to form (elastic#53856)
  EMT-issue-65: add endpoint list api (elastic#53861)
  [SIEM] Fix doubled drag handles in Timeline (elastic#52679)
  Functional tests: refactor visualize_page (elastic#53845)
  [Dashboard] Redesign empty screen in readonly mode (elastic#54073)
  [ML] Support search for partitions on Single Metric Viewer (elastic#53879)
  update apm index pattern (elastic#54095)
  Add data ui for envoyproxy Metricbeat Module (elastic#53476)
  [ML] persist the brush when expanded to full width (elastic#54020)
  Skip failing test (elastic#54100)
  [APM] Show errors on the timeline instead of under the transaction (elastic#53756)
  ...
@kevinlog kevinlog changed the title EMT-issue-65: add endpoint list api [Endpoint] EMT-issue-65: add endpoint list api Jan 9, 2020
@kevinlog kevinlog added Team: Endpoint Management Team:Endpoint Data Visibility Team managing the endpoint resolver Team:Endpoint Response Endpoint Response Team labels Jan 9, 2020
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

History

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

Copy link
Contributor

@paul-tavares paul-tavares left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @nnamdifrankie - thanks for getting this through.
I was at x-school last week and just got a chance to review it and posted my comments (all optional).

_source: EndpointData;
}

export interface EndpointResultList {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry I'm late - was getting x-schooled last week.

Should we move this to server/types.ts? Would be good for the FE to use it as well when typing up the API response.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will consider this and probably put a small PR out.

validate: {
body: schema.nullable(
schema.object({
paging_properties: schema.arrayOf(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was wondering why the paging_properties is an Array<Object>. Would it be simpler to define it as an object with shorter options names:

{
    paging: {
        size: number,
        page: number
    }
}

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I made the change because for some reason the order of property mattered. So size will always have to come before page, else it would be ignored. I also wanted validation from the schema too. I gave it a shot and this was the compromise.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @nnamdifrankie .
That seems weird - is that perhaps an issue with the new platform that we're using? If you think it is, maybe report it to the Kibana platform team (slack channel #kibana-platform )

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will.

page_size: schema.number({ defaultValue: 10, min: 1, max: 10000 }),
}),
// the index of the page to return
schema.object({ page_index: schema.number({ defaultValue: 0, min: 0 }) }),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if I read the code correctly, page_index is zero-based. For simplicity, should it be 1-based? (which mean it would be a pass-through to the elasticsearch from option)?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, the from field is 0 based, so your first page is 0 to page size.

},
options: { authRequired: true },
},
async (context, req, res) => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI: personally, I also like the naming on the function. One drawback of anonymous functions is debugging where you just see "anonymous" in stack traces or when doing heap/cpu profiling (but perhaps we don't do much of that, so its ok)

// the page size requested
request_page_size: number;
// the index requested
request_index: number;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For consistency, could this match the name of the paging input param? (request_page_index)

@kevinlog kevinlog added the Feature:Endpoint Elastic Endpoint feature label Feb 18, 2020
oatkiller pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2020
* Add Endpoint plugin and Resolver embeddable (#51994)

* Add functional tests for plugins to x-pack (so we can do a functional test of the Resolver embeddable)
* Add Endpoint plugin
* Add Resolver embeddable
* Test that Resolver embeddable can be rendered

 Conflicts:
	x-pack/.i18nrc.json
	x-pack/test/api_integration/apis/index.js

* [Endpoint] Register endpoint app (#53527)

* register app, create functional test

* formatting

* update tests

* adjust test data for endpoint

* add endpoint tests for testing spaces, app enabled, disabled, etc

* linting

* add read privileges to endpoint

* rename variable since its used now

* remove deprecated context

* remove unused variable

* fix type check

* correct test suite message

Co-Authored-By: Larry Gregory <lgregorydev@gmail.com>

Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Larry Gregory <lgregorydev@gmail.com>

* [Endpoint] add react router to endpoint app (#53808)

* add react router to endpoint app

* linting

* linting

* linting

* correct tests

* change history from hash to browser, add new test util

* remove default values in helper functions

* fix type check, use FunctionComponent as oppsed to FC

* use BrowserRouter component

* use BrowserRouter component lin

* add comments to test framework, change function name to include browserHistory

Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>

* EMT-issue-65: add endpoint list api (#53861)

add endpoint list api

* EMT-65:always return accurate endpoint count (#54423)

EMT-65:always return accurate endpoint count, independent of paging properties

* Resolver component w/ sample data (#53619)

Resolver is a map. It shows processes that ran on a computer. The processes are drawn as nodes and lines connect processes with their parents.

Resolver is not yet implemented in Kibana. This PR adds a 'map' type UX. The user can click and drag to pan the map and zoom using trackpad pinching (or ctrl and mousewheel.)

There is no code providing actual data. Sample data is included. The sample data is used to draw a map. The fundamental info needed is:

process names
the parent of a process
With this info we can topologically lay out the processes. The sample data isn't yet in a realistic format. We'll be fixing that soon.

Related issue: elastic/endpoint-app-team#30

* Resolver test plugin not using mount context. (#54933)

Mount context was deprecated. Use core.getStartServices() instead.

* Resolver nonlinear zoom (#54936)

* [Endpoint] add Redux saga Middleware and app Store (#53906)

* Added saga library
* Initialize endpoint app redux store

* Resolver is overflow: hidden to prevent obscured elements from showing up (#55076)

* [Endpoint] Fix saga to start only after store is created and stopped on app unmount (#55245)

- added `stop()`/`start()` methods to the Saga Middleware creator factory
- adjust tests based on changes
- changed application `renderApp` to stop sagas when react app is unmounted

* Resolver zoom, pan, and center controls (#55221)

* Resolver zoom, pan, and center controls

* add tests, fix north panning

* fix type issue

* update west and east panning to behave like google maps

* [Endpoint] FIX: Increase tests `sleep` default duration back to 100ms (#55492)

Revert `sleep()` default duration, in the saga tests, back to 100ms in order to prevent intermittent failures during CI runs.

Fixes #55464
Fixes #55465

* [Endpoint] EMT-65: make endpoint data types common, restructure (#54772)

[Endpoint] EMT-65: make endpoint data types common, use schema changes

* Basic Functionality Alert List (#55800)

* sets up initial grid and data type

* data feeds in from backend but doesnt update

* sample data feeding in correctly

* Fix combineReducers issue by importing Redux type from 'redux' package

* Add usePageId hook that fires action when user navigates to page

* Strict typing for middleware

* addresses comments and uses better types

* move types to common/types.ts

* Move types to endpoint/types.ts, address PR comments

blah 2

Co-authored-by: Pedro Jaramillo <peluja1012@gmail.com>

* [Endpoint] Add Endpoint Details route (#55746)

* Add Endpoint Details route

* add Endpoint Details tests

* sacrifices to the Type gods

* update to latest endpoint schema

Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>

* [Endpoint] EMT-67: add kql support for endpoint list (#56328)

[Endpoint] EMT-67: add kql support for endpoint list

* [Endpoint] ERT-82 ERT-83 ERT-84: Alert list API with pagination (#56538)

* ERT-82 ERT-83 ERT-84 (partial): Add Alert List API with pagination

* Better type safety for alert list API

* Add Test to Verify Endpoint App Landing Page (#57129)

 Conflicts:
	x-pack/test/functional/page_objects/index.ts

* fixes render bug in alert list (#57152)

Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>

* Resolver: Animate camera, add sidebar (#55590)

This PR adds a sidebar navigation. clicking the icons in the nav will focus the camera on the different nodes. There is an animation effect when the camera moves.

 Conflicts:
	yarn.lock

* [Endpoint] Task/basic endpoint list (#55623)

* Adds host management list to endpoint security plugin

Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>

* [Endpoint] Policy List UI route and initial view (#56918)

* Initial Policy List view

* Add `endpoint/policy` route and displays Policy List
* test cases (both unit and functional)

Does not yet interact with API (Ingest).

* Add ApplicationService app status management (#50223)

This was already backported, but changes to endpoint app could not be
backported, since endpoint app itself hadn't been backported. Now that
the endpoint app is backported, reapply the endpoint specific changes
from the original commit.

* Implements `getStartServices` on server-side (#55156)

This was already backported, but changes to endpoint app could not be
backported, since endpoint app itself hadn't been backported. Now that
the endpoint app is backported, reapply the endpoint specific changes
from the original commit.

* [ui/utils/query_string]: Remove unused methods & migrate apps to querystring lib (#56957)

This was already backported, but changes to endpoint app could not be
backported, since endpoint app itself hadn't been backported. Now that
the endpoint app is backported, reapply the endpoint specific changes
from the original commit.

Co-authored-by: Kevin Logan <56395104+kevinlog@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Larry Gregory <lgregorydev@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: nnamdifrankie <56440728+nnamdifrankie@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Davis Plumlee <56367316+dplumlee@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul Tavares <56442535+paul-tavares@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Pedro Jaramillo <peluja1012@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dan Panzarella <pzl@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Madison Caldwell <madison.rey.caldwell@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charlie Pichette <56399229+charlie-pichette@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Candace Park <56409205+parkiino@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Pierre Gayvallet <pierre.gayvallet@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexey Antonov <alexwizp@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature:Endpoint Elastic Endpoint feature release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team:Endpoint Data Visibility Team managing the endpoint resolver Team:Endpoint Response Endpoint Response Team v7.6.0 v8.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants