Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EIP editor apprenticeship meeting 12 #106

Closed
poojaranjan opened this issue Jan 25, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

EIP editor apprenticeship meeting 12 #106

poojaranjan opened this issue Jan 25, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Member

poojaranjan commented Jan 25, 2022

Date and Time

Tuesday, Feb 08, 2022, at 16:00 UTC

Location

Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81211958072?pwd=ZU5BSVkvNHZWb0s1RnpqSzBLRFI5QT09

Agenda

  • Go over some of the EIP GitHub Issues & Pull Requests as a walk through the editing process.
  • Q&A
    • Why some of the PRs are marked as "Ambiguous"?
    • What is the suggested "EIP category" to propose a proposal, if the author is unclear?

Please leave a comment for anything else you would like to learn/discuss.

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Member Author

poojaranjan commented Feb 9, 2022

Summary

Recording - https://youtu.be/tfxJtVyylII

  • PR-4744 - EIP-3607 moved to Final
  • PR-4746 - EIP-3668 moved to Final
  • PR-4747 - A new proposal (EIP-4747), improvement suggestions added
  • PR-4748 - Adding mission statement to EIP GitHub Readme(almost good, just one extra space to be removed)
  • PR-4671 - A new proposal (EIP-4671), improvement suggestions added
  • PR-4766 - minor edit to EIP-747, looks good, authors approval required.
  • PR-4751 - What other PRs are open?
  • PR-4721 - A new proposal (EIP-4721), improvement suggestions added
  • PR-4736 - A new proposal (4736), EIP number and minor improvement suggestions added
  • PR-4653 - EIP-2612 to review, looks good, approved
  • PR-4416 - EIP-1328, move from stagnant to review
  • PR-4780 - A new proposal (4780), EIP number and improvement suggestions added

Important notes

If an author is not sure what is the best EIP "Type" or "Category" at the time of documentation, proceed with the best judgement at the time. EIP type and category can be changed later on.

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Member Author

Closing in favor of #109

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant