-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 301
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TEST: Parse projects as .csproj #3265
Conversation
aed121e
to
393a583
Compare
393a583
to
9e305c5
Compare
@alfonsogarciacaro I think this must be releated to if Python thinks the project is an executable (non-relative imports) or a library (relative imports). The test project should be an executable so somehow the |
Ah, you're right, thanks! This should be easy to fix, I'll have a look. |
@alfonsogarciacaro, but default should be "Library" and the test project file for Python does not set it. If you add |
@alfonsogarciacaro I wonder if using e.g |
Or is fsharp test projects by default executable? Ref: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66941970/but-it-is-entrypointattribute-attribute-must-be-the-last-declaration-in-the-l "A 'Program.fs' file can be automatically generated for F# .NET Core test projects. To fix this warning, either delete the file from the project, or set the property to 'false'.." |
You're right @dbrattli. It seems the problem is when compiling as a .csproj the default for OutputType is different. I'm also overriding If we set "Compiling project as Library. This is normally used if you want to distribute the code as a Python package. If you intend to run the code directly, please set OutputType to Exe." |
@alfonsogarciacaro, I think this should be fine. It will perhaps break a few test projects, but it's sort of confusing that it actually did work without setting output type to Exe. It's such a shame that the import system of Python is so confusing 🤦 No-one really understands it fully. As for the message we could simplify it e.g: "Compiling project as Library. If you intend to run the code directly, please set OutputType to Exe.". Because we do not usually distribute the library as a package when using Fable, we just import it as a module (library) into an existing program e.g like we do with fable_library. |
e63932f
to
5a49e83
Compare
5a49e83
to
e6c040d
Compare
Ok, let's merge this, publish and give it a try. If it gives problems we can always revert the PR. |
@dbrattli You should check out the import system in Rust then, it may change your mind about Python's 🙂 I would consider not having to use it a major selling point for Fable just by itself. |
@alfonsogarciacaro From what I've seen trying to use Buildalyzer with |
It just crossed my mind that project parsing is almost the same in F# and C#, but the latter is going to be usually better supported so, what if we parse the project as if it were a C# one and tweak the results? In this PR I just copy the .fsproj into a .csproj file, pass it to Buildalyzer and with a few adjustments it seems to work. One of the main differences is the F# compiler inserts FSharp.Core when it's not explicitly referenced, but this is already done when restoring.
Another important advantage is Buildalyzer can do a design-time build for C# projects which is much faster. For F# projects parsing takes as long as a normal build (I experienced the same with Dotnet.ProjInfo and Ionide.ProjInfo).
All the build jobs are working except for Python. @dbrattli Could you please have a look at the logs? But if the error message doesn't ring a bell immediately don't worry and I'll try to debug the Python build and compare the compiler args when parsing .fsproj or (fake) .csproj.
What do you think? Looks like a viable option or is too hacky? cc @ncave