[Flight] Rename Chunk constructor to ReactPromise #30747
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
facebook-github-bot
added
the
React Core Team
When printing these in DevTools they show up as the name of the constructor so then you pass a Promise to the client it logs as "Chunk" which is confusing. Ideally we'd probably just name this Promise but 1) there's a slight difference in the .then method atm 2) it's a bit tricky to name a variable.
sebmarkbage
force-pushed
the
renamechunk
branch
from
09059c5 to
9067f28
Compare
gnoff
approved these changes
Aug 19, 2024
eps1lon
added a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 23, 2024
**breaking change for canary users: Bumps peer dependency of React from `19.0.0-rc-1eaccd82-20240816` to `19.0.0-rc-eb3ad065-20240822`** No changes required in Next.js it seems. [diff facebook/react@1eaccd82...eb3ad065](facebook/react@1eaccd8...eb3ad06) <details> <summary>React upstream changes</summary> - facebook/react#30761 - facebook/react#30779 - facebook/react#30775 - facebook/react#30770 - facebook/react#30756 - facebook/react#30755 - facebook/react#30768 - facebook/react#30760 - facebook/react#30732 - facebook/react#30757 - facebook/react#30750 - facebook/react#30751 - facebook/react#30753 - facebook/react#30740 - facebook/react#30748 - facebook/react#30746 - facebook/react#30747 - facebook/react#30731 - facebook/react#30725 - facebook/react#30741 - facebook/react#30730 - facebook/react#30726 - facebook/react#30717 - facebook/react#30729 - facebook/react#30721 - facebook/react#30720 - facebook/react#30705 </details>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When printing these in DevTools they show up as the name of the constructor so then you pass a Promise to the client it logs as "Chunk" which is confusing.
Ideally we'd probably just name this Promise but 1) there's a slight difference in the .then method atm 2) it's a bit tricky to name a variable and get it from the global in the same scope. Closure compiler doesn't let us just name a function because it removes it and just uses the variable name.