This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 1, 2022. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
Fixes a bug surfaced by d4f6bef. See the unexpected test failure at https://github.com/fossas/spectrometer/pull/277/checks?check_run_id=3000639861.
Previously, programs that ran a successful
DiagnosticsC
action underlogWithExit_
would (incorrectly) continue evaluation. These are not the intended semantics. Instead, a successful run should exit successfully, much like how an unsuccessful run exits with failure.This bug affects commands with steps after
logWithExit_
e.g.fossa test
always exits non-zero even on success.Acceptance criteria
Actions run with
logWithExit_
should exit zero on success.Testing plan
Run a
fossa test
on a revision with no issues (I'm using the latest Spectrometer revision). See that it succeeds. Check that the exit code is zero.Risks
This significantly changes the semantics of
logWithExit_
. I believe these were the original intended semantics given that this is only ever used as a wrapper for commands (seegrep logWithExit_
), but other code that uses this will now abort surprisingly.Checklist
haskell-language-server
) any haskell files I touched in this PR.docs/
.Changelog.md
if this change is externally facing. If this PR did not mark a release, I added my changes into an# Unreleased
section at the top.