We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hello,
I just wanted to share with everybody that TVs from TCL needs the output surface workaround. (At least the tcl_eu model).
// Explayer 2.X - MediaCodecVideoRenderer class private static boolean codecNeedsSetOutputSurfaceWorkaround(String name) { // Work around #3236. return (("deb".equals(Util.DEVICE) || "flo".equals(Util.DEVICE)) && "OMX.qcom.video.decoder.avc".equals(name)) || ("tcl_eu".equals(Util.DEVICE) && "OMX.MTK.VIDEO.DECODER.AVC".equals(name)); }
Best.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Add some additional device specific workarounds
fc5e8ee
Issue: #3355 Issue: #3257 ------------- Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=172587141
5357726
No branches or pull requests
Hello,
I just wanted to share with everybody that TVs from TCL needs the output surface workaround.
(At least the tcl_eu model).
// Explayer 2.X - MediaCodecVideoRenderer class
private static boolean codecNeedsSetOutputSurfaceWorkaround(String name) {
// Work around #3236.
return (("deb".equals(Util.DEVICE) || "flo".equals(Util.DEVICE)) && "OMX.qcom.video.decoder.avc".equals(name))
|| ("tcl_eu".equals(Util.DEVICE) && "OMX.MTK.VIDEO.DECODER.AVC".equals(name));
}
Best.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: