-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add job for running queries #1072
Conversation
@@ -153,3 +154,17 @@ def extract_table_to_storage(self, name, source, *destination_uris): | |||
""" | |||
return ExtractTableToStorageJob(name, source, destination_uris, | |||
client=self) | |||
|
|||
def run_query(self, name, query): | |||
"""Construct a job for running a BG SQL query. |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Thanks for the tweaks. As for my other questions? |
Yes, shortly.
I've looked at them: we have similar coverage, except one missing for #1068.
We could bag the property/validation stuff, and just rely on docs for the user-settable configuration attributes. Or we could write a 'validating descriptor' helper and use that instead of custom property methods.
We don't have coverage for the |
Rebased on top of #1075. |
Ping me when #1075 is in. |
If the initial configuration does not set a table, the back-end creates a new one with a generated name.
LGTM |
Uses #1068 as a base.