Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-enabling redefined-builtin for Pylint. #1737

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2016

Conversation

dhermes
Copy link
Contributor

@dhermes dhermes commented Apr 22, 2016

In the process, refactoring places where builtins were used intentionally or un-intentionally.

Inspired by discussion with @rimey in #1691.

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Apr 22, 2016
@dhermes dhermes mentioned this pull request Apr 22, 2016
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ class InternalServerError(ServerError):
code = 500


class NotImplemented(ServerError):
class NotImplementedMethod(ServerError):
"""Exception mapping a '501 Not Implemented' response."""

This comment was marked as spam.

This comment was marked as spam.

@dhermes dhermes force-pushed the re-enable-builtins-lint-check branch from 484a5ce to 1792d20 Compare April 22, 2016 17:39
@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor Author

dhermes commented Apr 22, 2016

@tseaver PTAL

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Apr 22, 2016

LGTM

@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor Author

dhermes commented Apr 22, 2016

Will squash then merge.

In the process, refactoring places where builtins were used
intentionally or un-intentionally.
@dhermes dhermes force-pushed the re-enable-builtins-lint-check branch from 1792d20 to aefdd22 Compare April 22, 2016 18:20
@dhermes dhermes merged commit f227fdc into googleapis:master Apr 22, 2016
@dhermes dhermes deleted the re-enable-builtins-lint-check branch April 22, 2016 18:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants