Fix deadlock by removing lock in frameNavigated #942
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes
In certain navigations, the current frame may have child frames (e.g.
iframe
s within a root frame). In these cases, the child frames need to be removed during a navigation. Before this changeframeNavigated
held ontoframesMu
lock for the whole duration offrameNavigated
, but when it determined that the current root frame held child frames, it would callremoveFramesRecursively
.removeFramesRecursively
, which is what removes the child frames, needs the same lock (framesMu
) so it can amend the synchronised variable which holds all references to the frames on the current page.It's also worth noting that this also prevents
frameNavigated
holding on to a lock when it callsChildFrames
, which requires another lock. It's generally unsafe to hold onto more than one lock at a time.Closes: #941
Checklist