-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
"syntaxic sugar" for some fused glyphs #1013
Comments
Also, it seems Solesmes is using pes stratus too, so it will certainly be more common in the future, it would be best if |
#898 is an overhaul of the oriscus glyphs. Currently, the reverse-ness of an oriscus is relative to whether the following note is above or below in some of the cases. My intent is to remove this relative-ness for consistency. So instead of "oriscus" and "oriscus reversus", there will simply be "ascending oriscus" and "descending oriscus" (and, of course, "scapus" varieties). The current glyphs will be rationalized to this naming and the missing glyphs will be added. For example, That is not a change to take lightly, and will probably take me a week or two to implement (given I work during the day). Compared to that, this change (#1013, that is) is simply one of electing to fuse a glyph when certain branches of the state machine are hit, and is much less complex. |
Well, 10 glyphs is almost nothing, let's do it! |
Question about the naming. It seems to be that a "pes stratus" is a pes followed by an oriscus. Is "pes stratus" the correct name for a "pes" using oriscus for both notes? |
Oh... I have 0 clue about that... if it's a "Nocturnale Romanum-ism", maybe we can call it |
While you're asking, can you check if Solesmes's usage of "pes stratus" means the pes-followed-by-oriscus or the oriscus-followed-by-oriscus? If not the latter, I think I would opt to just use fusion for these shapes. |
Sure! |
So, for Solesmes, a pes stratus is a punctum fused with an oriscus above, no queue (the form in the NR doesn't correspond very well to the adiastematic shape apparently), so |
Given that clarification, since the NR form will not come into more common use (and moreso doesn't conform to a nondiastematic shape), I will leave out the "syntactic sugar" for it. It means less to maintain (and fewer potential bugs to fix). |
sure, sounds good |
Solesmes uses the glyph
(go@hd~)
(a torculus liquescens with first note being an oriscus). The only way to get it now is through fusion, but it would be best if(gohd~)
had the same output (using fusion behind the scenes). Maybe the same principle could be applied to thepes stratus
of #898 ? Anyway, this is not a top priority.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: