-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cmd/protoc-gen-go-grpc: add change detector test #7072
Conversation
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #7072 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 81.27% 81.23% -0.05%
==========================================
Files 345 345
Lines 33927 33927
==========================================
- Hits 27574 27560 -14
- Misses 5191 5198 +7
- Partials 1162 1169 +7 |
.github/workflows/testing.yml
Outdated
VET_SKIP_PROTO=1 | ||
./vet.sh -install && ./vet.sh |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: I think these can fit on one line.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I dont know of a clean one line way to apply VET_SKIP_PROTO
to both ./vet.sh
commands
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh ... you need it set for both? :(
If you're interested, I've been meaning to delete VET_SKIP_PROTO
and instead make it the default, with VET_CHECK_PROTO=1
set if you actually what to check the proto files.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a good idea. I can send a follow for that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
-- I'll actually wait for that to merge before merging this PR
The ugliness here ^^ is because i was trying to run the Github workflow |
|
That doesn't sound right, or are you saying it's because you were doing some temporary testing? Please make sure vet-proto is passing. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are right. vet-proto
is not supposed to fail. Fixed that and addressed your other comments.
Fixes: #6748
RELEASE NOTES: none