-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Array API compliance #774
Comments
Thanks a lot for this list @fschlimb! |
|
hello @ClaudiaComito , I would like to work on this issue as a part of gsoc. It would be great If you could guide me how can I start. I am aware of numpy but not much aware of parallel computing. |
Check out data-apis/array-api#462 for tracking and potentially signalling array API compliance, although it doesn't look like the workflow is final. |
|
Re: how/whom to report compliance to, we could be contributing Heat JSON data to the array-api-comparison repository. If I understand correctly, the JSON data are created when running the array-api-tests with the I managed to clone the repo and compile their tools, the result looks something like this: |
That repository has nothing to do with compliance. It helps comparing the names of equivalent functions in existing libraries. |
A consortium is defining an Array API: https://data-apis.org/array-api/latest/index.html
It seems desirable for HeAT to be as compliant as possible.
The following features are missing in HeAT (others are probably incomplete):
The following features are missing in the array itself (others are probably incomplete):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: