-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use uv instead of pip in development env #113517
Conversation
08ab939
to
e406dca
Compare
I tested it now on a fresh live system and it works without problems regardless whether uv is already installed or not. For me it looks good to go :) (I can't judge about the Docker part, however) |
Tested it codespaces/dev container and also locally on arch. Feel free to test it in different dev envs :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me @edenhaus 👍
../Frenck
I do get
now when |
Breaking change
Proposed change
Replace pip by uv in the development environment including all scripts and dev container
Split from #112496
Type of change
Additional information
Checklist
ruff format homeassistant tests
)If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:
If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:
Updated and included derived files by running:
python3 -m script.hassfest
.requirements_all.txt
.Updated by running
python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all
..coveragerc
.To help with the load of incoming pull requests: