Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TIP-52: Multi Address #152

Draft
wants to merge 25 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

TIP-52: Multi Address #152

wants to merge 25 commits into from

Conversation

PhilippGackstatter
Copy link

Rendered Version

Note that:

  • This TIP is in Draft mode and as such is still being updated.
  • Links to other new TIPs don't work and will only work once the TIP is merged.

PhilippGackstatter and others added 2 commits November 6, 2023 09:07
Co-authored-by: Thibault Martinez <thibault@iota.org>
Unlocks other than _Empty Unlocks_, which do not add to this sum.
- `Cumulative Unlocked Weight >= Threshold`.

### Empty Unlock
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should it be a syntactic rule that it can't be used outside of a MultiUnlock or are we fine waiting semantic and see that address/unlock is not a good match?

Copy link
Author

@PhilippGackstatter PhilippGackstatter Nov 10, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The schemas tell you where the Empty Unlock is allowed - only in Multi Unlocks.

It's somewhat similar for implicit account creation addresses. They are also not allowed in Address Unlock Conditions within NFT Outputs, but are allowed in Basic Outputs. Neither are they allowed in Expiration Unlock Conditions. Those rules are not defined explicitly (but can be derived from TIP-42 when being creative), but really the rule is encoded in the schema of the Expiration UC.

Since we already have the schemas and they are much easier to maintain in the TIPs I would like to avoid duplicating those rules in text were it cannot be automatically updated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants