Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 25, 2023. It is now read-only.

Added benchmark of kube-batch #427

Closed
k82cn opened this issue Oct 14, 2018 · 7 comments
Closed

Added benchmark of kube-batch #427

k82cn opened this issue Oct 14, 2018 · 7 comments
Labels
area/test good first issue Denotes an issue ready for a new contributor, according to the "help wanted" guidelines. help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling.

Comments

@k82cn
Copy link
Contributor

k82cn commented Oct 14, 2018

DESCRIPTION: -- symptom of the problem a customer would see

After enabled pod affinity/anti-affinity at #418 , we need to know the impact to the kube-batch performance.

@k82cn k82cn added good first issue Denotes an issue ready for a new contributor, according to the "help wanted" guidelines. help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. area/test sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. labels Oct 14, 2018
@k82cn k82cn added this to the v0.3 milestone Oct 14, 2018
@k82cn k82cn modified the milestones: v0.3, v0.4 Dec 21, 2018
@Jeffwan
Copy link
Contributor

Jeffwan commented Jan 14, 2019

  1. I think this one depends on Add performance metrics #487? Once kube-batch exposes metric, it would be easy to check benchmark result.
  2. Do we also want to add benchmark utilities like https://github.com/kubernetes/perf-tests?

@k82cn
Copy link
Contributor Author

k82cn commented Jan 15, 2019

both are necessary :)

metrics is helpful for product, perf is helpful for test, debug. I think we can do metrics firstly.

@thandayuthapani
Copy link
Contributor

For benchmark of kube-batch using scheduler-perf a WIP PR has been raised #597, but there are problems in scheduler-perf test integration suite, since they bring up API Server without CRD Support, but kube-batch depends on CRDs like PodGroup, We are trying to add CRD Capability to the API Server, which is being brought up by scheduler-perf integration test suite. This is where we are working on now to bring CRD capability to that API Server, and that is our blocking point now.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 27, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jul 27, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area/test good first issue Denotes an issue ready for a new contributor, according to the "help wanted" guidelines. help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants