-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 490
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding webhook to e2e tests with kind, moving deploy to gateway-system namespace #1051
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: robscott The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks great to me, although I think the day is coming that we'll need to move the mechanisms to actually apply-and-check the things to Go code.
fi | ||
|
||
# Install invalid gateway-api resources. | ||
# None of these examples should be successfully configured | ||
# This is very hacky, sorry. | ||
# Firstly, apply the examples, remembering that errors are on stdout | ||
kubectl apply --kubeconfig "${KUBECONFIG}" --recursive -f hack/invalid-examples 2>&1 | \ | ||
kubectl apply --recursive -f hack/invalid-examples 2>&1 | \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Every time I look at this I shudder a bit. I'm worried it's a bit fragile, but I can't think of a way to improve it without writing our own kubectl apply thing. :)
/lgtm |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR includes 3 related changes:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #1040
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: