Make Kubernetes aware of the LoadBalancer behaviour

[Sh4d1]

Enhancement Description

• Make Kubernetes aware of the LoadBalancer behaviour
• Kubernetes Enhancement Proposal: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-network/1860-kube-proxy-IP-node-binding
• Primary contact (assignee): @Sh4d1 @rikatz @RyanAoh
• Responsible SIGs: sig-network, sig-cloudprovider
• Enhancement target (which target equals to which milestone):
  • Alpha release target (x.y): 1.29
  • Beta release target (x.y): 1.30
  • Stable release target (x.y): 1.32
• Alpha
  • KEP (k/enhancements) update PR(s):
    • 1.19 Make Kubernetes aware of the LoadBalancer behaviour #1392
    • 1.20 Set KEP 1860 as implementable #2134
    • 1.29 KEP-1860: Make Kubernetes aware of the LoadBalancer behavior (reopen) #4114
  • Code (k/k) update PR(s):
    • 1.28 Make Kubernetes aware of the LoadBalancer behaviour kubernetes#118895
    • Make Kubernetes aware of the LoadBalancer behaviour kubernetes#119937
    • follow up on " Merged Make Kubernetes aware of the LoadBalancer behaviour" kubernetes#120068
  • Docs (k/website) update(s):
    • add blog for feature LoadBalancerIPMode website#43904
    • add doc for feature LoadBalancerIPMode website#43476
• Beta
  • KEP (k/enhancements) update PR(s): KEP-1860 - Propose beta graduation and add missing PRR  #4509
  • Code (k/k) update PR(s): Promote LoadBalancerIPMode to Beta kubernetes#123418
  • Docs (k/website) update(s): Promote LoadBalancerIPMode to Beta website#45219
• Stable
  • KEP (k/enhancements) update PR(s): Add the implementation history section #4891, Promote LoadBalancerIPMode to GA #4854
  • Code (k/k) update PR(s): Promote LoadBalancerIPMode to GA kubernetes#127348
  • Docs (k/website) update(s): Promote LoadBalancerIPMode to GA website#47938

Please to keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team track efficiently the evolution of the enhancement

[Sh4d1]

/sig network

[fejta-bot]

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

[Sh4d1]

/remove-lifecycle stale

[kikisdeliveryservice]

Hi @Sh4d1

1.20 Enhancements Lead here. This KEP still seems to be a draft (it's provisional) but wanted to check-in to see if you thought this would be graduating alpha in 1.20?

Enhancements Freeze is October 6th and by that time we require:

The KEP must be merged in an implementable state
The KEP must have test plans
The KEP must have graduation criteria
The KEP must have an issue in the milestone

Best,
Kirsten

[kikisdeliveryservice]

Note: this provisional kep was implemented without having a compliant kep or indicating to the enhancements team that it would be in the 1.20 milestone.

[jeremyrickard]

Hey @Sh4d1 and @thockin,

👋 1.20 release lead here. We're really close to code freeze at this point (Thursday) and it seems like this KEP fell through the cracks and the process.

Based on this comment in the PR above: kubernetes/kubernetes#92312 (comment) can we not land this in 1.20 and instead target 1.21?

There are few things w/ the KEP that really should be address:

• It's provisional still
• There is no test plan
• There is no graduation criteria

Looks like there is also a PR to update the KEP https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/pull/2134/files that addresses this stuff, however it also marks it as implemented and targets 1.21. Typically, we set to implemented only after the release.

Can we circle back around on this and agree that we should try to land this in 1.21 at this point? We've already got a lot of content for the release so far (sig-docs has their work cut out for themselves!!!), we're two days out from code freeze, we have these disconnects mentioned above?

[Sh4d1]

@jeremyrickard just opened kubernetes/kubernetes#96454 to revert it, sorry again!
And updated #2134 to set it as implentable instead of implemented

[fejta-bot]

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale

[fejta-bot]

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten

[fejta-bot]

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close

[k8s-ci-robot]

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[Sh4d1]

/reopen

[k8s-ci-robot]

@Sh4d1: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[thockin]

This went beta in 30. GA in 31? Or wait for 32?

[rikatz]

I am not sure if I will be able to work through it to GA for 31

@danwinship and @aojea I've seen some movement of this and KinD cloud provider, any feedback there?

I will get some feedback internally as well

@RyanAoh do you wanna take over back for .30?

[aojea]

@danwinship and @aojea I've seen some movement of this and KinD cloud provider, any feedback there?

@danwinship is going to add the feature to e2e tests and we are going to test it in the CI with cloud provider kind, that now uses envoy ... I think this testing can give us good confidence ... but maybe waiting one release in beta is not. bad option

[rikatz]

Agreed. Tim, let's target for .32 then :)

[thockin]

ACK. Flagged to re-evaluate in 32

[k8s-triage-robot]

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

• Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
• Close this issue with /close
• Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

[thockin]

@rikatz @RyanAoh - how does this look for 1.32?

[RyanAoh]

OK, I would promote it to GA in 1.32.

[rikatz]

Thanks @RyanAoh !

I will watch it, let me know if you need something from me!

[aojea]

Dan and I added way more coverage with cloud-provider-kind so I think we are good to go

[thockin]

Can I get a quick update? Is someone on the hook for a PR to promote this?

[rikatz]

I am not, @RyanAoh is in charge of this one :)

[RyanAoh]

@thockin I'm on it and I'll submit the PR(codes, docs and the PRR) this weekend.

[tjons]

Hello @RyanAoh 👋, Enhancements team here.

Just checking in as we approach enhancements freeze on 02:00 UTC Friday 11th October 2024 / 19:00 PDT Thursday 10th October 2024.

This enhancement is targeting for stage stable for v1.32 (correct me, if otherwise).

Here's where this enhancement currently stands:

• [] KEP readme using the latest template has been merged into the k/enhancements repo.
• KEP status is marked as implementable for latest-milestone: v1.32.
• KEP readme has up-to-date graduation criteria
• KEP has a production readiness review that has been completed and merged into k/enhancements. (For more information on the PRR process, check here). If your production readiness review is not completed yet, please make sure to fill the production readiness questionnaire in your KEP by the PRR Freeze deadline on Thursday 3rd October 2024 so that the PRR team has enough time to review your KEP.

To track this KEP for enhancements freeze:

• [] the KEP readme is missing the Implementation History section. Once you update this and populate the section we can track this for enhancements freeze.

The status of this enhancement is marked as at risk for enhancement freeze. Please keep the issue description up-to-date with appropriate stages as well. Thank you!

If you anticipate missing enhancements freeze, you can file an exception request in advance. Thank you!

[RyanAoh]

@tjons The Implementation History section has been added to the kep readme.

[tjons]

@RyanAoh with all the requirements met, this enhancement is now tracked for enhancements freeze! 🚀

[hacktivist123]

Hello @RyanAoh 👋 1.32 Docs Shadow here.

Does this enhancement work planned for 1.32 require any new docs or modifications to existing docs?
If so, please follow the steps here to open a PR against the dev-1.32 branch in the k/website repo. This PR can be just a placeholder at this time and must be created before Thursday, October 24th 2024 18:00 PDT.

Also, take a look at Documenting for a release to get yourself familiarize with the docs requirement for the release.
Thank you!

[rytswd]

Hi @RyanAoh 👋 -- this is Ryota (@rytswd) from the v1.32 Communications Team!

For the v1.32 release, we are currently in the process of collecting and curating a list of potential feature blogs, and we'd love for you to consider writing one for your enhancement!

As you may be aware, feature blogs are a great way to communicate to users about features which fall into (but not limited to) the following categories:

• This introduces some breaking change(s)
• This has significant impacts and/or implications to users
• ...Or this is a long-awaited feature, which would go a long way to cover the journey more in detail 🎉

To opt in to write a feature blog, could you please let us know and open a "Feature Blog placeholder PR" (which can be only a skeleton at first) against the website repository by Wednesday, 30th Oct 2024? For more information about writing a blog, please find the blog contribution guidelines 📚

Tip

Some timeline to keep in mind:

• 02:00 UTC Wednesday, 30th Oct: Feature blog PR freeze
• Monday, 25th Nov: Feature blogs ready for review
• You can find more in the release document

Note

In your placeholder PR, use XX characters for the blog date in the front matter and file name. We will work with you on updating the PR with the publication date once we have a final number of feature blogs for this release.

[hacktivist123]

Hello, @RyanAoh 👋 1.32 Docs Shadow here.

This is just a reminder to open a placeholder PR against dev-1.32 branch in the k/website repo for this (steps available here) for this KEP if it requires new or modifications to existing docs:

The deadline for this is Thursday, Oct 24 at 18:00 PDT.
Thanks! 🚀