-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft KEPs for out-of-tree cloud providers #735
Draft KEPs for out-of-tree cloud providers #735
Conversation
--- | ||
title: Support Out-of-Tree AWS Cloud Provider | ||
authors: | ||
- @andrewsykim |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
--- | ||
title: Support Out-of-Tree Azure Cloud Provider | ||
authors: | ||
- @andrewsykim |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc @justaugustus @khenidak to update SIG Azure KEP once this PR is merged
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
and @lachie83 :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should this file put under sig-azure directory?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@andrewsykim @feiskyer -- I think when someone picks one of the templates up, they can maybe:
- Move the template into the relevant SIG directory
- Update the [top-level out-of-tree KEP}(https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-cloud-provider/2019-01-25-removing-in-tree-providers.md) to include a link to the SIG-specific one (in the same PR)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sure, make sense
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah that works for me, will leave the file here for now in this PR then :)
--- | ||
title: Support Out-of-Tree GCE Cloud Provider | ||
authors: | ||
- @andrewsykim |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc @cheftako to update this KEP once this PR is merged
--- | ||
title: Support Out-of-Tree IBM Cloud Provider | ||
authors: | ||
- @andrewsykim |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
--- | ||
title: Support Out-of-Tree OpenStack Cloud Provider | ||
authors: | ||
- @andrewsykim |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc @dims @hogepodge to update this KEP once this PR is merged .
--- | ||
title: Support Out-of-Tree vSphere Cloud Provider | ||
authors: | ||
- @andrewsykim |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc @frapposelli @cantbewong to update this KEP once this PR is merged
- @andrewsykim | ||
owning-sig: sig-cloud-provider | ||
participating-sigs: | ||
- sig-aws |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sig-azure
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
KEP filename should be YYYYMMDD-kep-title.md
5bb7943
to
c35f81e
Compare
Comments addressed PTAL :) |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: andrewsykim, justaugustus The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Drafted up a KEP template we'll be using for tracking out-of-tree cloud provider enhancements for v1.14. Hoping to get this PR merged ASAP and then delegating the TODOs in each KEP to the respective provider SIGs (AWS, Azure, GCE, IBM, OpenStack, VMware).