Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add e2e test suite to detect memory leaks in lua #4236

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2019

Conversation

aledbf
Copy link
Member

@aledbf aledbf commented Jun 27, 2019

What this PR does / why we need it:

FOCUS=DynamicCertificates E2E_CHECK_LEAKS=true make e2e-test

Which issue this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close that issue when PR gets merged): fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 27, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 27, 2019
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jun 27, 2019

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@37a8287). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #4236   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   57.85%           
=========================================
  Files             ?       87           
  Lines             ?     6544           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?     3786           
  Misses            ?     2327           
  Partials          ?      431

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 37a8287...5918870. Read the comment docs.

@aledbf aledbf force-pushed the leaks branch 2 times, most recently from 7393886 to b7d3bda Compare June 27, 2019 23:35
@aledbf aledbf changed the title WIP: Add e2e test suite to detect memory leaks in lua Add e2e test suite to detect memory leaks in lua Jun 27, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 27, 2019
@aledbf
Copy link
Member Author

aledbf commented Jun 28, 2019

/test pull-ingress-nginx-test

@aledbf
Copy link
Member Author

aledbf commented Jun 28, 2019

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 28, 2019
@ElvinEfendi
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 28, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 28, 2019
@aledbf aledbf removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 28, 2019
@@ -632,7 +631,6 @@ stream {
lua_shared_dict tcp_udp_configuration_data 5M;

init_by_lua_block {
require("resty.core")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@ElvinEfendi
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 28, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: aledbf, ElvinEfendi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@aledbf
Copy link
Member Author

aledbf commented Jun 28, 2019

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit d9d8ce7 into kubernetes:master Jun 28, 2019
@aledbf aledbf deleted the leaks branch June 28, 2019 21:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants