Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Calico to v3.27.3 #16363

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

hakman
Copy link
Member

@hakman hakman commented Feb 18, 2024

No description provided.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 18, 2024
@justinsb
Copy link
Member

From one the mount-bpffs logs: calico-node: error while loading shared libraries: libpcap.so.0.8: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

It's on all the nodes, but e.g. https://gcsweb.k8s.io/gcs/kubernetes-jenkins/pr-logs/pull/kops/16363/pull-kops-e2e-cni-calico-ipv6/1759139852261003264/artifacts/cluster-info/kube-system/calico-node-8xp9w/

Maybe we need to install libpcap in nodeup when using calico?

@hakman
Copy link
Member Author

hakman commented Feb 25, 2024

/test pull-kops-kubernetes-e2e-ubuntu-gce-build

1 similar comment
@hakman
Copy link
Member Author

hakman commented Feb 25, 2024

/test pull-kops-kubernetes-e2e-ubuntu-gce-build

@hakman
Copy link
Member Author

hakman commented Mar 1, 2024

Related to projectcalico/calico#8541. We will wait for v3.27.3.

@hakman hakman changed the title Update Calico to v3.27.2 Update Calico to v3.27.3 Apr 2, 2024
@hakman hakman requested review from justinsb and rifelpet and removed request for olemarkus and johngmyers April 2, 2024 02:39
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Apr 2, 2024

@hakman: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kops-e2e-cni-calico-ipv6 b5813b2 link false /test pull-kops-e2e-cni-calico-ipv6

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@hakman
Copy link
Member Author

hakman commented Apr 2, 2024

@rifelpet Could you check this error with IPv6? Looks related to #16448.

Error: error determining default DNS zone: error querying zones:
error listing hosted zones: operation error Route 53:
ListHostedZones, failed to resolve service endpoint, endpoint rule error,
Invalid Configuration: Missing Region

@rifelpet
Copy link
Member

rifelpet commented Apr 2, 2024

Yes I'll take a look. The old code wasn't specifying a region either so there must be a behavioral change in v2 that isnt documented in the migration guide.

https://github.com/kubernetes/kops/pull/16448/files#diff-8b59c898fa44da5fbbb0cf9868a918db03cdefe41c6855ef5840762ba9837455

it only happens in the ipv6 job too.

@hakman
Copy link
Member Author

hakman commented Apr 2, 2024

Yes I'll take a look. The old code wasn't specifying a region either so there must be a behavioral change in v2 that isnt documented in the migration guide.

https://github.com/kubernetes/kops/pull/16448/files#diff-8b59c898fa44da5fbbb0cf9868a918db03cdefe41c6855ef5840762ba9837455

it only happens in the ipv6 job too.

Exactly. Could we merge this and the cherry-pick in the mean time?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 2, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rifelpet

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 2, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 7cb8724 into kubernetes:master Apr 2, 2024
24 of 25 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.30 milestone Apr 2, 2024
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2024
…-upstream-release-1.29

Automated cherry pick of #16363: Update Calico to v3.27.3
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
#16363-origin-release-1.28

Automated cherry pick of #16192: Update Calico to v3.27.0
#16363: Update Calico to v3.27.3
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/addons cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants