Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

amend UVIP KEP with some additional details #20

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 23, 2023
Merged

Conversation

logicalhan
Copy link

No description provided.

requests reflect the newest one. We specifically rule out merging discovery docs, because
merging discovery is:

* complicated
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this part still seems wrong to me or at least needs to go in an unresolved block

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure moved.

locally (we can use the StorageVersion API), it will proxy the request to
one of the apiservers that is listed in the object. If an apiserver fails
to respond is not available, then we will return a 503 (there is a small
possibility of a race between the controller registering the apiserver
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm gonna merge this but we need a better story for this race, IMO

@lavalamp lavalamp merged commit a134f0f into lavalamp:UVIP Mar 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants