Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: integrate gossipsub by default #17

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 28, 2019

Conversation

vasco-santos
Copy link
Member

@vasco-santos vasco-santos commented May 27, 2019

This PR modified the pubsub tests, to test both implementations with gossipsub and floodsub implementations.

Needs:

@vasco-santos
Copy link
Member Author

cc @wemeetagain @Mikerah

@Mikerah
Copy link

Mikerah commented May 27, 2019

In general, it looks good to me. But, shouldn't we want to test with multiple topics with multiple publishers and subscribers as well? This is usually the case when differences in implementations appear.

@vasco-santos
Copy link
Member Author

@Mikerah ideally yes! I will work on adding some more tests

@vasco-santos vasco-santos force-pushed the feat/integrate-gossipsub-by-default branch 6 times, most recently from 6ea3f0c to 660d2e4 Compare July 15, 2019 13:17
@vasco-santos vasco-santos force-pushed the feat/integrate-gossipsub-by-default branch from 660d2e4 to 92d2f65 Compare July 31, 2019 14:57
@vasco-santos vasco-santos force-pushed the feat/integrate-gossipsub-by-default branch from 92d2f65 to 20e8cf3 Compare August 27, 2019 08:07
@vasco-santos vasco-santos marked this pull request as ready for review August 27, 2019 08:16
@vasco-santos vasco-santos requested a review from jacobheun August 27, 2019 08:16
@vasco-santos vasco-santos merged commit de0edfe into master Aug 28, 2019
@vasco-santos vasco-santos deleted the feat/integrate-gossipsub-by-default branch August 28, 2019 09:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants