Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 26, 2023. It is now read-only.

feat!: add upgrader options #290

Merged

Conversation

ckousik
Copy link
Contributor

@ckousik ckousik commented Sep 27, 2022

Allow upgrader to accept a StreamMuxerFactory and skip encryption for transports that inherently support encryption and/or multiplexing (WebRTC, WebTransport, etc.)

@ckousik
Copy link
Contributor Author

ckousik commented Sep 27, 2022

@mxinden @MarcoPolo

@BigLep
Copy link

BigLep commented Oct 4, 2022

@achingbrain achingbrain changed the title Add Upgrader Options feat: add Upgrader Options Oct 4, 2022
@achingbrain achingbrain changed the title feat: add Upgrader Options feat: add upgrader options Oct 4, 2022
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "@libp2p/interface-stream-muxer",
"version": "2.0.2",
"version": "2.0.3",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we avoid this too for the same reason as: #290 (comment) ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, sorry. Will fix

@MarcoPolo MarcoPolo requested a review from achingbrain October 5, 2022 15:55
@ckousik
Copy link
Contributor Author

ckousik commented Oct 5, 2022

@MarcoPolo wouldn't we have to update the patch version since we have added features?

@MarcoPolo
Copy link
Contributor

@achingbrain made it sound like the version numbers are handled by CI during release. I don't know much more.

@mpetrunic
Copy link
Member

@MarcoPolo wouldn't we have to update the patch version since we have added features?

If you added a feature, a minor version should be updated. But in this case, since the title contains "feat:", CI will automatically update versions where needed.

Copy link
Member

@achingbrain achingbrain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, just needs the extra boolean option adding.

IMPORTANT: this is a breaking change. Before merging the following needs to happen:

  1. The title of this PR needs to change from feat: add upgrader options to feat!: add upgrader options
  2. The commit message needs to have the following added to it when this PR is squashed and merged (the format is important - "BREAKING CHANGE: " followed by a one-line sentence - this will be added to the release notes and changelog):
BREAKING CHANGE: the return type of StreamMuxer.newStream can now return a promise

Either one of the above two changes will make semantic-release rev the version numbers correctly when CI runs on master after merge. Both changes will make doubly sure it doesn't miss it.

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ export interface StreamMuxer extends Duplex<Uint8Array> {
* Initiate a new stream with the given name. If no name is
* provided, the id of the stream will be used.
*/
newStream: (name?: string) => Stream
newStream: (name?: string) => Stream | Promise<Stream>
Copy link
Member

@achingbrain achingbrain Oct 5, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on our learnings from #295 this is a breaking change.

Making this change locally with libp2p master indeed fails to compile.

packages/interface-transport/src/index.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@MarcoPolo MarcoPolo changed the title feat: add upgrader options feat!: add upgrader options Oct 5, 2022
@achingbrain
Copy link
Member

achingbrain commented Oct 6, 2022

I don't know why GH isn't showing the actions that have run on this PR but the build is failing. Can you please ensure you can run the build, lint and test npm scripts successfully.

@ckousik
Copy link
Contributor Author

ckousik commented Oct 6, 2022

@achingbrain that is an older commit. I can run build, lint, and test successfully.

BREAKING CHANGE: the return type of StreamMuxer.newStream can now return a promise

async new stream

fix mocks

Update packages/interface-transport/package.json

Co-authored-by: Marco Munizaga <marco@marcopolo.io>

test

fix versioning

fix lint
@ckousik ckousik force-pushed the ckousik/upgrader-options branch from edfc77c to 1ea2e47 Compare October 6, 2022 10:15
@ckousik
Copy link
Contributor Author

ckousik commented Oct 6, 2022

@achingbrain Could you merge this? I don't have permissions to merge.

@achingbrain
Copy link
Member

Yes, I was just waiting for CI to be green.

@achingbrain
Copy link
Member

It's here, still not sure why it doesn't appear on this PR: https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p-interfaces/actions/runs/3197326618

@achingbrain achingbrain merged commit c502b66 into libp2p:master Oct 6, 2022
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2022
## [@libp2p/interface-stream-muxer-v3.0.0](https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p-interfaces/compare/@libp2p/interface-stream-muxer-v2.0.2...@libp2p/interface-stream-muxer-v3.0.0) (2022-10-06)

### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

* the return type of StreamMuxer.newStream can now return a promise

Co-authored-by: Marco Munizaga <marco@marcopolo.io>

### Features

* add upgrader options ([#290](#290)) ([c502b66](c502b66))
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 6, 2022

🎉 This PR is included in version @libp2p/interface-stream-muxer-v3.0.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2022
## [@libp2p/interface-stream-muxer-compliance-tests-v5.0.0](https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p-interfaces/compare/@libp2p/interface-stream-muxer-compliance-tests-v4.0.0...@libp2p/interface-stream-muxer-compliance-tests-v5.0.0) (2022-10-06)

### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

* the return type of StreamMuxer.newStream can now return a promise

Co-authored-by: Marco Munizaga <marco@marcopolo.io>

### Features

* add upgrader options ([#290](#290)) ([c502b66](c502b66))

### Dependencies

* update sibling dependencies ([66b4993](66b4993))
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 6, 2022

🎉 This PR is included in version @libp2p/interface-stream-muxer-compliance-tests-v5.0.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2022
## [@libp2p/interface-transport-v2.0.0](https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p-interfaces/compare/@libp2p/interface-transport-v1.0.4...@libp2p/interface-transport-v2.0.0) (2022-10-06)

### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

* the return type of StreamMuxer.newStream can now return a promise

Co-authored-by: Marco Munizaga <marco@marcopolo.io>

### Features

* add upgrader options ([#290](#290)) ([c502b66](c502b66))

### Dependencies

* update sibling dependencies ([66b4993](66b4993))
* update sibling dependencies ([5de9728](5de9728))
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 6, 2022

🎉 This PR is included in version @libp2p/interface-transport-v2.0.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2022
## [@libp2p/interface-mocks-v6.0.0](https://github.com/libp2p/js-libp2p-interfaces/compare/@libp2p/interface-mocks-v5.1.0...@libp2p/interface-mocks-v6.0.0) (2022-10-06)

### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

* the return type of StreamMuxer.newStream can now return a promise

Co-authored-by: Marco Munizaga <marco@marcopolo.io>

### Features

* add upgrader options ([#290](#290)) ([c502b66](c502b66))

### Dependencies

* update sibling dependencies ([0fae3ee](0fae3ee))
* update sibling dependencies ([8a89a05](8a89a05))
* update sibling dependencies ([66b4993](66b4993))
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 6, 2022

🎉 This PR is included in version @libp2p/interface-mocks-v6.0.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants