Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BOLT] Use direct storage for Label annotations. NFCI. #70147

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 6, 2023

Conversation

maksfb
Copy link
Contributor

@maksfb maksfb commented Oct 24, 2023

Store the Label annotation directly in the operand and avoid the extra allocation and indirection overheads associated with MCSimpleAnnotation.

Store the Label annotation directly in the operand and avoid the
extra allocation and indirection overheads associated with
MCSimpleAnnotation.
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 6, 2023

✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter.

@maksfb maksfb merged commit b336d74 into llvm:main Nov 6, 2023
3 checks passed
@maksfb maksfb deleted the gh-label-annotation branch November 6, 2023 22:27
maksfb added a commit to maksfb/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2023
After llvm#70147, all primary annotation types are stored directly in the
instruction and hence there's no need for the temporary storage we've
used previously for repopulating preserved annotations.
maksfb added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
After #70147, all primary annotation types are stored directly in the
instruction and hence there's no need for the temporary storage we've
used previously for repopulating preserved annotations.
zahiraam pushed a commit to zahiraam/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2023
After llvm#70147, all primary annotation types are stored directly in the
instruction and hence there's no need for the temporary storage we've
used previously for repopulating preserved annotations.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants