Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

competition comparison spreadsheet #68

Closed
jbibla opened this issue Nov 21, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

competition comparison spreadsheet #68

jbibla opened this issue Nov 21, 2017 · 6 comments
Labels
low priority has been discussed, will be addressed later

Comments

@jbibla
Copy link
Collaborator

jbibla commented Nov 21, 2017

  • build comparison sheet for other UI's / wallets so we know where we stand in the market
@jbibla jbibla self-assigned this Nov 21, 2017
@jbibla
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jbibla commented Nov 24, 2017 •
edited
Loading

please feel free to add apps / wallets and features that you'd like to be tracked

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yjtQ5_SyOI6VJ6PZYiFrWhzikpyjFWK__drjVUVS2DE/edit#gid=0

@jbibla
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jbibla commented Dec 11, 2017

@faboweb though i think this would be great to have, i'm not sure i can justify spending time on it pre-launch. our pre-launch feature set is already fairly well defined and there is a lot of work to do in preparation for launch.

what do you think?

@faboweb
Copy link
Collaborator

faboweb commented Dec 12, 2017

Good question. Maybe we miss sth. important we don't see yet. Investing a little could be beneficial.

@NodeGuy NodeGuy mentioned this issue Mar 14, 2018
Closed
@jbibla jbibla added the low priority has been discussed, will be addressed later label Jun 29, 2018
@jbibla
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jbibla commented Aug 2, 2018

the doc lives in google drive - not sure if we need this open issue anymore

@jbibla jbibla closed this as completed Aug 2, 2018
@faboweb
Copy link
Collaborator

faboweb commented Aug 3, 2018

The sheet holds no real data. And I think we need this.

@faboweb faboweb reopened this Aug 3, 2018
@fedekunze fedekunze removed the policy label Aug 31, 2018
@jbibla jbibla removed their assignment Aug 31, 2018
@fedekunze
Copy link
Contributor

Closing as we’ll use the benchmarking on Notion

faboweb pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 2, 2020
@colw @faboweb
Fix typo and no return. (#68)
6dcc80e
faboweb added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 2, 2020
@faboweb
Update production (#75)
5a468dc 
* added node install to docker

* run npm install correct

* don't copy modules

* use env variables for testnet

* Update pr.yml

* github workflows changes

* Update pr.yml

* Update pr.yml

* Update pr.yml

* Update pr.yml

* Update pr.yml

* Update pr.yml

* Update pr.yml

* Update pr.yml

* Update pr.yml

* Make search case-insensitive (#36)

Modify variable names for clarity.

* Query balance by denomination (#48)

* colw/subscription-fix (#47)

* Fix transaction destructure

* Lint

* Rename for consistency

* Override method for V2

* Colw/fix denom and votes (#49)

* Use larger denom for governance parameters

* Lint

* Fix: Leave in big number format for line #86

* Fabo/minor fixes (#51)

* gracefully handle no rewards

* always return balance

* prevent error when no rewards

* fix wrong delegation amount showing

* log transaction if tag is empty (#58)

* fix tally for running proposals (#54)

* Fabo/move testnet definition into network configs file (#56)

* move testnet definition into network configs file

* use configs for endpoints

* update cache key per block (#57)

* colw/minor-fixes (#59)

* Export testnet data for use in LunieDB Source

* Fix get query

* Mario/32 add proposal proposer (#52)

* Add proposal proposer

* Add proposer to proposals page

* Revert package.js mod, use Promise.all

* Call all queries at same time in getProposalById

* Api error 500 fix

* Fabo suggestions

* Add cross-env

* Resolve merge conflict

* Fix merge error

* deliver correct testnet url (#60)

* Latest proposal should be on top (#61)

* Colin's magic

* const proposals

* fix to not crash if no denom

* Fabo/wait for stargate to be up (#62)

* debug missing denom

* do not call validators

* await for the remote instance to be up before loading static data

* remove logs

* remove fallback

* comment

* Update cosmosV0-source.js

* Update cosmosV0-source.js

* Update cosmosV0-source.js

* colw/subscription-refactor (#63)

* Factor out subscription object

* WIP

* Reenable subs

* Do not pre-populate cache (temp)

This is run on every request.

* Reenable static data

* Fix

* Remove comment

* WIP

* Use API class within subscription object

* Update file and parameter naming

* Load API classes once.

* Revert "Load API classes once."

ca567095360dbd7a8d81c7a53fe4fe885f3b63d2

* Set headers in separate method

* format comment

* Rename class variable

* Split static data up

* Adjust cache timing, default 5

* Update lib/schema.js

Co-Authored-By: Fabian <frznhope@gmail.com>

* Change client name to TendermintClient

* Comment and rename for clarity

* Cache specific blocks longer

* Move Tendermint client to CosmosNodeSubscription

* Comments for clarity

* Clear memory after handling each new block (#66)

* Fix typo and no return. (#68)

* Aleksei/sentry added (#67)

* only sentry init code added

* docker-compose changes

* inspect removed

* colw/Decrease validator list loading time (#69)

* Fetch validators each new block and store them

* Store block, and sync validator map with block

* Add block to store

* Remove unused parameters

* Retrieve a single validator form the map

* Review fix: remove height parameter

* Review fix: Change variable name for clarity

* Return delegations and rewards from store (#70)

* Return delegations and rewards from store

* overview values

* Remove unnecessary Promise.all
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
low priority has been discussed, will be addressed later
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@NodeGuy @faboweb @jbibla @fedekunze