Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 21, 2024. It is now read-only.

'in' (and '!in') filters fail with ~64k elements in set #10

Closed
dcervelli opened this issue Jan 28, 2016 · 0 comments
Closed

'in' (and '!in') filters fail with ~64k elements in set #10

dcervelli opened this issue Jan 28, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@dcervelli
Copy link

There's a stack overflow due to all of the filter elements being passed as arguments. This bug is more important if #8 is fixed because that opens up use cases where this could be useful.
mourner added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 29, 2016
@mourner
fast eval-less filter implementation
9ba624b 
Closes #6, closes #8, closes #10.
@mourner mourner mentioned this issue Jan 29, 2016
Closed
mourner added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 29, 2016
@mourner
faster and simpler filter implementation
55aecbb 
Closes #6, closes #10, ref #8.
@mourner mourner mentioned this issue Jan 29, 2016
Merged
mourner added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 29, 2016
@mourner
faster and simpler filter implementation
b4bc18d 
Closes #6, closes #10, ref #8.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@dcervelli