Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(db): Make get_expected_l1_batch_timestamp() more efficient #963

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2024

Conversation

slowli
Copy link
Contributor

@slowli slowli commented Jan 29, 2024

Hopefully. It's not the exact same query as previously, but it should be equivalent.

What ❔

Makes get_expected_l1_batch_timestamp() DB query more efficient (hopefully) by getting rid of the WHERE l1_batch_number IS NULL clause.

Why ❔

Inefficient DB queries are bad, mkay.

Checklist

  • PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs).
  • Code has been formatted via zk fmt and zk lint.
  • Spellcheck has been run via zk spellcheck.
  • Linkcheck has been run via zk linkcheck.

Hopefully. It's not the exact same query as previously,
but it should be equivalent.
@slowli slowli marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2024 16:17
@slowli slowli enabled auto-merge January 29, 2024 16:28
@slowli slowli added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 29, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jan 29, 2024
@slowli slowli added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 29, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jan 29, 2024
@slowli slowli added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 29, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jan 29, 2024
@slowli slowli added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 29, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 7334679 Jan 29, 2024
33 checks passed
@slowli slowli deleted the aov-fix-expected-timestamp branch January 29, 2024 19:10
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[20.2.0](core-v20.1.0...core-v20.2.0)
(2024-01-30)


### Features

* added unauthenticated version of gcs object store
([#916](#916))
([638a813](638a813))
* Adding EN snapshots applier
([#882](#882))
([0d2ba09](0d2ba09))
* consensus component config for main node and external node
([#881](#881))
([1aed8de](1aed8de))
* **en:** Make ENs detect reorgs earlier
([#964](#964))
([b043cc8](b043cc8))
* **en:** Restore state keeper storage from snapshot
([#885](#885))
([a9553b5](a9553b5))
* protobuf-generated json configs for the main node (BFT-371)
([#458](#458))
([f938314](f938314))
* Remove zkevm_test_harness public reexport from zksync_types
([#929](#929))
([dd1a35e](dd1a35e))
* **state-keeper:** track the time that individual transactions spend in
mempool ([#941](#941))
([fa45aa9](fa45aa9))
* **vm:** detailed circuit statistic
([#845](#845))
([a20af60](a20af60))
* **vm:** Support tracers for old vm
([#926](#926))
([9fc2d95](9fc2d95))


### Bug Fixes

* **api:** Order transaction traces in `debug_traceBlock*` methods
([#924](#924))
([5918ef9](5918ef9))
* **db:** Make `get_expected_l1_batch_timestamp()` more efficient
([#963](#963))
([7334679](7334679))
* **db:** Make `snapshot_recovery` migration backward-compatible
([#961](#961))
([e756762](e756762))
* **zksync_types:** Update SerializationTransactionError::OversizedData
description
([#949](#949))
([c95f3ee](c95f3ee))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants