Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changes related to the next Meilisearch release (v0.29.0) #434

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Feb 13, 2023

Conversation

meili-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@meili-bot meili-bot commented Aug 29, 2022

Related to this issue: meilisearch/integration-guides#211

This PR:

  • gathers the changes related to the next Meilisearch release (v0.29.0) so that this package is ready when the official release is out.
  • should pass the tests against the latest pre-release of Meilisearch.
  • might eventually contain test failures until the Meilisearch v0.29.0 is out.

⚠️ This PR should NOT be merged until the next release of Meilisearch (v0.29.0) is out.

This PR is auto-generated for the pre-release week purpose.

Done:

  • Add a matchingStrategy parameter to SearchRequest class
  • Add a test for new matchingStrategy parameters
  • Add a test for using a wildcard in action parameters when creating a Key.
  • Fix tests due to modifications

@alallema alallema mentioned this pull request Oct 13, 2022
@alallema alallema force-pushed the bump-meilisearch-v0.29.0 branch from 81ca721 to 1201de5 Compare February 2, 2023 16:30
@alallema alallema marked this pull request as ready for review February 2, 2023 16:30
@alallema alallema requested a review from brunoocasali February 2, 2023 16:30
@alallema alallema force-pushed the bump-meilisearch-v0.29.0 branch from 1201de5 to ecc0839 Compare February 2, 2023 16:44
@alallema alallema requested a review from brunoocasali February 8, 2023 15:40
@alallema alallema force-pushed the bump-meilisearch-v0.29.0 branch from 0784d84 to a603c5b Compare February 9, 2023 11:52
@alallema alallema requested a review from brunoocasali February 9, 2023 11:52
brunoocasali
brunoocasali previously approved these changes Feb 12, 2023
src/main/java/com/meilisearch/sdk/SearchRequest.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/test/java/com/meilisearch/integration/SearchTest.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Bruno Casali <brunoocasali@gmail.com>
Copy link
Member

@brunoocasali brunoocasali left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!!! 🍣

@alallema alallema merged commit b5a8159 into main Feb 13, 2023
@alallema alallema deleted the bump-meilisearch-v0.29.0 branch February 13, 2023 18:57
@alallema alallema added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 13, 2023
bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2023
542: Update version for the next release (v0.10.0) r=alallema a=alallema

Check out the changelog of [Meilisearch v0.29.0](https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/releases/tag/v0.29.0) for more information on the changes.

## ⚠️ Breaking changes

This breaking change *__may not affect you__*, but in any case, you should check your search queries if you want to keep the same behavior from `v0.28`.
* The `NOT` filter keyword does not have an implicitly `EXIST` operator anymore. Check out for more information: meilisearch/meilisearch#2486
* Correction of naming methods related to Ranking Rules (#539) `@ghousek1`

## 🚀 Enhancements

* Ensure support to the new search query parameter `MatchingStrategy` (#434) `@alallema`
* Ensure support to keys with wildcarded actions.
  - `actions` field during key creation now accepts wildcards on actions. For example, `indexes.*` provides rights to `indexes.create`, `indexes.get`,`indexes.delete`, `indexes.delete`, and `indexes.update`. (#434) `@alallema` 

Thanks again to `@alallema` and `@ghousek1` ! 🎉

Co-authored-by: alallema <amelie@meilisearch.com>
Co-authored-by: Amélie <alallema@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants