Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Define default logging retention policies #50

Open
christoferlof opened this issue May 10, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Define default logging retention policies #50

christoferlof opened this issue May 10, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
@marrobi

Comments

@christoferlof
Copy link
Contributor

For auditing and troubleshooting purposes, all Azure resources provisioned should have logging and auditing enabled.
At this moment, we don't have any policies explicitly defined. These needs to be defined, implemented and clearly documented.

Originally posted by @deniscep in #49 (comment)
@christoferlof christoferlof mentioned this issue May 10, 2021
Merged
@christoferlof christoferlof added this to the Backlog milestone May 31, 2021
@marrobi marrobi removed this from the Backlog milestone Jun 27, 2023
@marrobi
Copy link
Member

marrobi commented Aug 11, 2023 •
edited
Loading

We can do this via Azure Policy similar to #3623 (comment)

Then remove all diagnostic settings from resources.

This will also improve experience when have orphaned diagnostic settings in Azure monitor.

@marrobi marrobi mentioned this issue Aug 11, 2023
Closed
@marrobi marrobi mentioned this issue Jul 19, 2024
Merged
tim-allen-ck pushed a commit to CloudKubed/AzureTRE that referenced this issue Aug 28, 2024
@danny-cooke-icl
Merge pull request microsoft#50 from ImperialCollegeLondon/imperial-d…
625b93c 
…evelopment

Imperial development v3 code
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@marrobi marrobi

Labels
None yet
Projects
Azure TRE - Engineering
Status: Backlog
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@christoferlof @marrobi