[ci] fix getting status of optional workflows in PRs with a lot of comments

[StrikerRUS]

Refer to https://docs.github.com/en/rest/reference/issues#list-issue-comments.

In #3234 (comment) script cannot update status for Solaris CI build because it doesn't receive the latest comments in that PR.

[jameslamb]

haha WOW, I never imagined we'd have a PR with so many comments that it would require pagination over GitHub API results 😂

thanks for investigating this

[shiyu1994]

Thank you for this. Sorry about the long PR which causes inconvenience.

[jameslamb]

Sorry about the long PR which causes inconvenience.

Don't worry at all! Sorry, I was not complaining. I appreciate you patiently keeping it open all this time until we were ready to start on 4.0.

I've also been the author of PRs with a lot of comments 😄

[jameslamb]

works for me, thanks!

[StrikerRUS]

That was totally my fault in poor design of comments retrieving routine. Of course, it should has worked for any size PRs from the beginning. I'm sorry about that!

[shiyu1994]

That was totally my fault in poor design of comments retrieving routine. Of course, it should has worked for any size PRs from the beginning. I'm sorry about that!

Many thanks to you for supporting the ci tests. You've done very well!

[github-actions]

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity since it was closed. To start a new related discussion, open a new issue at https://github.com/microsoft/LightGBM/issues including a reference to this.