-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 204
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ES reports version 6.7.0 in telemetry, even when it's built off a development branch #830
Comments
astrogeco
added a commit
to astrogeco/cFE
that referenced
this issue
Aug 31, 2020
The version number macros major, minor, and revision, are used in the HK telemetry which can lead to confusion.
Probably should open another one in OSAL |
astrogeco
added a commit
to astrogeco/cFE
that referenced
this issue
Aug 31, 2020
The version number macros major, minor, and revision, are used in the HK telemetry which can lead to confusion.
astrogeco
added a commit
to astrogeco/cFE
that referenced
this issue
Sep 1, 2020
The version number macros major, minor, and revision, are used in the HK telemetry which can lead to confusion.
astrogeco
added a commit
to astrogeco/cFE
that referenced
this issue
Sep 2, 2020
The version number macros major, minor, and revision, are used in the HK telemetry which can lead to confusion.
yammajamma
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 17, 2020
Fix #830, Set Revision to 99 for development build
This was referenced Oct 13, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the bug
Misidentifies version
To Reproduce
Look at version in ES housekeeping packet.
Expected behavior
System should report a consistent version number at startup, from noops, and in tlm. Could go back to the old way where development versions all report a revision of 99.
Code snips
cFE/fsw/cfe-core/src/es/cfe_es_task.c
Lines 333 to 340 in a148b97
System observed on:
Additional context
Got out of sync with new versioning scheme
Reporter Info
Jacob Hageman - NASA/GSFC
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: