-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 204
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix #1949, update msgid testcase to match implementation #1950
Merged
astrogeco
merged 1 commit into
nasa:integration-candidate
from
jphickey:fix-1949-update-testcase
Sep 16, 2021
Merged
Fix #1949, update msgid testcase to match implementation #1950
astrogeco
merged 1 commit into
nasa:integration-candidate
from
jphickey:fix-1949-update-testcase
Sep 16, 2021
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Updates the test case for "CFE_MSG_SetMsgId()" to write a value that is outside the set of storable values for MsgId. This test has a caveat that it is somewhat implementation-dependent, but by passing a MsgId value with all bits set, at least one of those bits is likely not correlated with a real header bit.
jphickey
added
the
CCB:Ready
Ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB)
label
Sep 14, 2021
astrogeco
added
CCB:Approved
Indicates code review and approval by community CCB
and removed
CCB:Ready
Ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB)
labels
Sep 15, 2021
CCB:2021-09-15 APPROVED |
astrogeco
added a commit
to nasa/cFS
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 21, 2021
*Combines* nasa/cFE#1967 *Includes:* nasa/cFE#1948, Update name of macros/functions added to "cfe_assert" nasa/cFE#1950, Fix Mismatch between MSG API and test case in "TestMsgId" functional test nasa/cFE#1962, Single time domain in functional time tests
2 tasks
astrogeco
added a commit
to astrogeco/cFS
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 22, 2021
**Combines** nasa/cFE#1967 v6.8.0-rc1+dev1024 nasa/osal#1158 v5.1.0-rc1+dev619 nasa/sch_lab#92 v2.4.0-rc1+dev53 nasa/sample_app#155 v1.2.0-rc1+dev73 nasa/to_lab#105 v2.4.0-rc1+dev58 nasa/ci_lab#93 v2.4.0-rc1+dev46 **Includes:** *cFE* nasa/cFE#1948, Update name of macros/functions added to "cfe_assert" nasa/cFE#1950, Fix Mismatch between MSG API and test case in "TestMsgId" functional test nasa/cFE#1962, Single time domain in functional time tests nasa/cFE#1943, add missing inclusions in CFE API headers nasa/cFE#1964, Use existing /ram for FS header test nasa/cFE#1956, Add static local to function test so data section is nonzero nasa/cFE#1960, Make invalid buffer length consistent in es task test nasa/cFE#1953, Only check base filename in library info functional nasa/cFE#1970, Confirm sb/time reset requirements in coverage test nasa/cFE#1947, Fix broken link in App Developers Guide nasa/cFE#1972, Fix #1971, avoid alias warning on some compilers *osal* nas/osal#1149, Enable symbol api test and MIR dump too large nasa/osal#1152, Fix OSAL loader test hard fails if size exceeded nasa/osal#1155, add bsp-specific configuration flag registry nasa/osal#1157, Add os-specifc socket flag function *Apps* nasa/ci_lab#92, Apply CFE_SB_ValueToMsgId where required nasa/sample_app#154, Apply CFE_SB_ValueToMsgId where required nasa/sch_lab#91, Apply CFE_SB_ValueToMsgId where required nasa/to_lab#104, Apply CFE_SB_ValueToMsgId where required Co-authored-by: Jacob Hageman <skliper@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Joseph Hickey <jphickey@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Adrien Chardon <nodraak@users.noreply.github.com>
astrogeco
added a commit
to nasa/cFS
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 22, 2021
**Combines** nasa/cFE#1967 v6.8.0-rc1+dev1024 nasa/osal#1158 v5.1.0-rc1+dev619 nasa/sch_lab#92 v2.4.0-rc1+dev53 nasa/sample_app#155 v1.2.0-rc1+dev73 nasa/to_lab#105 v2.4.0-rc1+dev58 nasa/ci_lab#93 v2.4.0-rc1+dev46 **Includes:** *cFE* nasa/cFE#1948, Update name of macros/functions added to "cfe_assert" nasa/cFE#1950, Fix Mismatch between MSG API and test case in "TestMsgId" functional test nasa/cFE#1962, Single time domain in functional time tests nasa/cFE#1943, add missing inclusions in CFE API headers nasa/cFE#1964, Use existing /ram for FS header test nasa/cFE#1956, Add static local to function test so data section is nonzero nasa/cFE#1960, Make invalid buffer length consistent in es task test nasa/cFE#1953, Only check base filename in library info functional nasa/cFE#1970, Confirm sb/time reset requirements in coverage test nasa/cFE#1947, Fix broken link in App Developers Guide nasa/cFE#1972, Fix #1971, avoid alias warning on some compilers *osal* nas/osal#1149, Enable symbol api test and MIR dump too large nasa/osal#1152, Fix OSAL loader test hard fails if size exceeded nasa/osal#1155, add bsp-specific configuration flag registry nasa/osal#1157, Add os-specifc socket flag function *Apps* nasa/ci_lab#92, Apply CFE_SB_ValueToMsgId where required nasa/sample_app#154, Apply CFE_SB_ValueToMsgId where required nasa/sch_lab#91, Apply CFE_SB_ValueToMsgId where required nasa/to_lab#104, Apply CFE_SB_ValueToMsgId where required Co-authored-by: Jacob Hageman <skliper@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Joseph Hickey <jphickey@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Adrien Chardon <nodraak@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe the contribution
Updates the test case for "CFE_MSG_SetMsgId()" to write a value that is outside the set of storable values for MsgId. This currently
uses the value "-1" do this, assuming that this translates to a value with all bits set, and at least one of those bits will not correlate with an actual header field.
Caveat is that in other implementations, it is possible that all bits are storeable in the header. That is, all MsgId values can be stored in a message or vice versa, even those MsgIds which are not route-able in SB.
This also updates the documentation of CFE_MSG_SetMsgId to clarify if/when the CFE_MSG_BAD_ARGUMENT status code is returned, and that the set of MsgId values which are "settable" really depends on the MSG implementation.
Fixes #1949
Testing performed
Build and sanity check CFE, run all tests.
Expected behavior changes
None with default MSG implementation and current config.
System(s) tested on
Ubuntu
Additional context
Note that the "CFE_SB_IsValidMsgId" and the related constants
CFE_SB_INVALID_MSG_ID
andCFE_PLATFORM_SB_HIGHEST_VALID_MSGID
are really pertinent message routing in SB and SBR, more so than MSG.The general concept of what constitutes a "valid" msgid is different for MSG than SB/SBR. For MSG it is just a matter of how many bits the real header has, and how this bits are mapped between the header and CFE_SB_MsgId_t type. For example there are values which are "storable" in the CCSDS primary header, but are not valid for SB/SBR or usable with CFE.
In particular, it is possible that an application might be serving as an intermediate node in a DTN network - in which case it might need to decode and/or encode messages which are not actually routed on the CFE software bus at all. It should be SB (and SBR) domain to determine if a MsgId is route-able. MSG only should care if it is store-able in the header.
Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Joseph Hickey, Vantage Systems, Inc.