Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #1905, Improve SB coverage #1922

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2021

Conversation

skliper
Copy link
Contributor

@skliper skliper commented Aug 31, 2021

Describe the contribution

Testing performed
Build, run, report coverage, confirm improvement. Now just missing 3 lines, 18 branches (all documented), 99.8%/97.0%.

Expected behavior changes
None, unit test updates for code coverage only

System(s) tested on

  • Hardware: Intel i5/Docker
  • OS: Ubuntu 18.04
  • Versions: Bundle main + this commit

Additional context
Issues for uncovered code:

Third party code
None

Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Jacob Hageman - NASA/GSFC

@skliper skliper added the CCB:Ready Ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB) label Aug 31, 2021
@skliper skliper added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Aug 31, 2021
@astrogeco astrogeco removed the CCB:Ready Ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB) label Sep 1, 2021
@astrogeco
Copy link
Contributor

CCB:2021-09-01 APPROVED

@astrogeco astrogeco added the CCB:Approved Indicates code review and approval by community CCB label Sep 1, 2021
@astrogeco astrogeco changed the base branch from main to integration-candidate September 7, 2021 21:29
@astrogeco astrogeco merged commit 21a3f3b into nasa:integration-candidate Sep 7, 2021
astrogeco added a commit to nasa/cFS that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2021
**Combines**

nasa/cFE#1939

**Includes**

*cFE*

nasa/cFE#1903, Update directory diagrams in application developer guide

nasa/cFE#1922, SB code coverage improvements #1905, Improve SB coverage

nasa/cFE#1936, Improve ES code coverage
astrogeco added a commit to nasa/cFS that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2021
**Combines**

nasa/cFE#1939, v6.8.0-rc1+dev994
nasa/osal#1145, v5.1.0-rc1+dev604
nasa/PSP#307, v1.5.0-rc1+dev124
nasa/sch_lab#87, v2.4.0-rc1+dev47

**Includes**

*cFE*

nasa/cFE#1903, Update directory diagrams in application developer guide

nasa/cFE#1922, SB code coverage improvements #1905, Improve SB coverage

nasa/cFE#1936, Improve ES code coverage

nasa/cFE#1938, Enforce minimum code coverage

nasa/cFE#1940, Update dev guide for MSG and SBR

nasa/cFE#1941, Support unimplemented features in MSG FT

*osal*

nasa/osal#1144, Regex update in coverage enforcement to match .0

nasa/osal#1142, Add typecast to memchr call

*psp*

nasa/PSP#307, check that module type is not invalid

nasa/PSP#306, do not override add_psp_module for coverage test

*sch_lab*

nasa/sch_lab#86, add CmdCode to sch_lab_table

nasa/sch_lab#88, Fix missing typedef

Co-authored-by: Jacob Hageman           <skliper@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joseph Hickey           <jphickey@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ariel Adams             <ArielSAdamsNASA@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jose F Martinez Pedraza <pepepr08@users.noreply.github.com>
@skliper skliper deleted the fix1905-sb_coverage branch October 22, 2021 19:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CCB:Approved Indicates code review and approval by community CCB
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SB code coverage improvements
3 participants