Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add PoolRpc::test_tx_pool_accept, check if the transaction can be accepted by TxPool #4433

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2024

Conversation

eval-exec
Copy link
Collaborator

@eval-exec eval-exec commented Apr 23, 2024

What problem does this PR solve?

Returns the result of transaction pool acceptance tests, indicating whether the raw transaction would be accepted by the transaction pool. The transaction will not be inserted into the transaction pool.

Related changes

  • Add test_tx_pool_accept for PoolRpc

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code ci-runs-only: [ quick_checks,linters ]

Side effects

  • None

Release note

Title Only: Include only the PR title in the release note.

@eval-exec eval-exec changed the title [WIP] PoolRPC::test_tx_pool_accept RPC Add PoolRpc::test_tx_pool_accept to test Apr 23, 2024
@eval-exec eval-exec changed the title Add PoolRpc::test_tx_pool_accept to test Add PoolRpc::test_tx_pool_accept, check if the transaction can be accepted by TxPool Apr 23, 2024
@eval-exec eval-exec marked this pull request as ready for review April 23, 2024 04:33
@eval-exec eval-exec requested a review from a team as a code owner April 23, 2024 04:33
@eval-exec eval-exec added the b:rpc Break RPC interface label Apr 23, 2024
quake
quake previously approved these changes Apr 24, 2024
@eval-exec
Copy link
Collaborator Author

eval-exec commented Apr 24, 2024

Squash and rebased on develop.

@quake quake enabled auto-merge April 24, 2024 02:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
b:rpc Break RPC interface
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants