Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Connecting interfaces only lists 50 interfaces on B side #1078

Closed
zevlag opened this issue Apr 13, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

Connecting interfaces only lists 50 interfaces on B side #1078

zevlag opened this issue Apr 13, 2017 · 0 comments
Labels
type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application

Comments

@zevlag
Copy link
Contributor

zevlag commented Apr 13, 2017

Issue type: Bug

Python version: 2.7
NetBox version: v2.0.0-dev

https://netbox/dcim/devices/145/interface-connections/add/?interface_a=2141

When trying to connect interfaces, the A side will show all interfaces on a device (56 of them in this case). If I select the same device for the B side, the dropdown list only shows 50 interfaces.
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application label Apr 13, 2017
jeremystretch added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 17, 2017
@jeremystretch
Fixes #1078: Increase default limit for number of objects returned by…
8032aa1 
… web form API call
@jeremystretch jeremystretch mentioned this issue Apr 27, 2017
Merged
lampwins pushed a commit to lampwins/netbox that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2017
@jeremystretch
Fixes netbox-community#1078: Increase default limit for number of obj…
bfea476 
…ects returned by web form API call
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 18, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@zevlag @jeremystretch