Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Losing site termination when editing circuit #1325

Closed
InsaneSplash opened this issue Jul 10, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

Losing site termination when editing circuit #1325

InsaneSplash opened this issue Jul 10, 2017 · 0 comments
Labels
type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application

Comments

@InsaneSplash
Copy link

Issue type: bug

Python version:
NetBox version:2.0.8

When editing a circuit that is currently attached to a device it displays that the circuit is terminated on a device and interface in the form. When saving the circuit, it looses this attached device details. The circuit needs to be re-edited with and the device details re-selected before saving the circuit details again.

No rack is selected as it is not required
@jeremystretch jeremystretch changed the title bug: loosing site termination when editing circuit Losing site termination when editing circuit Jul 10, 2017
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application label Jul 10, 2017
@jeremystretch jeremystretch mentioned this issue Jul 10, 2017
Merged
lampwins pushed a commit to lampwins/netbox that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2017
@jeremystretch
Fixes netbox-community#1325: Retain interface attachment when editing…
7b6d021 
… a circuit termination
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 18, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jeremystretch @InsaneSplash