-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
http: improve ClientRequest constructor #10654
Conversation
if (!common._checkIsHttpToken(method)) { | ||
throw new TypeError('Method must be a valid HTTP token'); | ||
|
||
if (methodIsString) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What if method is the empty string? It defaulted to 'GET'
before
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed + test added.
b2f1220
to
7a8b632
Compare
CI after another fix: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/5720/ |
// checks can greatly outperform the equivalent regexp (tested in V8 5.4). | ||
function isInvalidPath(s) { | ||
var len = s.length; | ||
if (len--) { if (s.charCodeAt(0) <= 32) return true; } else return false; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think assumption that path length is usually less than 6 chars is very far fetched. Should we really specialize to this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's just loop unrolling and from my testing it seems to help, no matter what the length is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the path not always expected to begin with /
? If so, the check for s.charCodeAt(0) can look specifically for that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jasnell The path does not always have to begin with a forward slash. Some notable examples include the HTTP CONNECT and OPTIONS methods which may use an absolute URI or asterisk respectively.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah yes... good ole CONNECT and OPTIONS...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@indutny Did that answer your question? If so, does this PR LGTY?
7a8b632
to
71b0bb9
Compare
I've changed the path validation function implementation a bit to squeeze out a tiny bit more performance. CI again: |
71b0bb9
to
7df1bef
Compare
@indutny ... does this LGTY with the recent updates? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
7df1bef
to
1291449
Compare
CI once more before landing: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/5853/ |
PR-URL: nodejs#10654 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#10654 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#10654 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#10654 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#10654 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#10654 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#10654 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#10654 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#10654 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#10654 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#10654 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#10654 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#10654 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#10654 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#10654 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#10654 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com>
should this be backported? |
ping |
ping @mscdex |
ping |
setting as baking for now |
These PRs improve ClientRequest creation performance and tidy up a few other things.
Results with the included benchmark:
/cc @nodejs/http
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/5716/
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)