Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: added TC meeting minutes for 2014-12-10 #144

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2014

Conversation

rvagg
Copy link
Member

@rvagg rvagg commented Dec 11, 2014

Closes #112

@rvagg rvagg force-pushed the tc-minutes-2014-12-10 branch from c68d251 to 0d206dd Compare December 11, 2014 09:45
@ralphtheninja
Copy link
Contributor

👍 The hangouts and the markdown notes is a huge win for transparency! 🙇

* Ben: binary name suggestion “iojs” with symlink to “node”, lots of discussion in https://github.com/iojs/io.js/issues/43
* **No disagreements, binary name will be “iojs”**
* Ben: how do we handle it on Windows? .bat file (problems with arg forwarding), small .exe
* Agreed to open a new issue to discuss Windows compat (Ben)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's #140, in case you want to link to it.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nope, but the mention here is good

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@trevnorris
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@mikeal
Copy link
Contributor

mikeal commented Dec 11, 2014

these notes are fantastic, great job @rvagg :)

@rvagg rvagg force-pushed the tc-minutes-2014-12-10 branch from 0d206dd to dcf73ca Compare December 11, 2014 22:40
@rvagg rvagg merged commit dcf73ca into nodejs:v0.12 Dec 11, 2014
@rvagg rvagg deleted the tc-minutes-2014-12-10 branch December 11, 2014 22:41
@rvagg rvagg restored the tc-minutes-2014-12-10 branch December 11, 2014 22:41
rvagg added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2014
closes #112

PR-URL: #144
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Mikeal Rogers <mikeal.rogers@gmail.com>
@brian-lamb-software-engineer

I dont know enough about this product, but i dont think its too early to be lifted to RSVP tildeos, es6 spec or the like. Its right on track and forward compatible with the spec... It will start saving you guys some headaches.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants