-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: test add and remove for lib/domain #24163
Conversation
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ | |||
'use strict'; | |||
|
|||
const common = require('../common'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you can drop the left hand side of this assignment, since common
isn't actually used anywhere.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. I forgot to run the linter before opening the pull request. Fixed this and switched from notEqual
to notStrictEqual
further down this file.
22d6025
to
a7f1185
Compare
Testing some of the more specific cases of using domain.add and domain.remove. For example, calling domain.add twice with same event emmiter and actually removing an event emitter from the domain.
a7f1185
to
339facb
Compare
The CI check failed the first time because there was something wrong with the .eslintrc.js. I amended the commit and forced pushed it to trigger the check again. |
landed as 4df24b6 , thanks. |
Testing some of the more specific cases of using domain.add and domain.remove. For example, calling domain.add twice with same event emmiter and actually removing an event emitter from the domain. PR-URL: #24163 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Testing some of the more specific cases of using domain.add and domain.remove. For example, calling domain.add twice with same event emmiter and actually removing an event emitter from the domain. PR-URL: #24163 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Testing some of the more specific cases of using domain.add and domain.remove. For example, calling domain.add twice with same event emmiter and actually removing an event emitter from the domain. PR-URL: nodejs#24163 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Testing some of the more specific cases of using domain.add and domain.remove. For example, calling domain.add twice with same event emmiter and actually removing an event emitter from the domain. PR-URL: #24163 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Testing some of the more specific cases of using domain.add and
domain.remove. For example, calling domain.add twice with same event
emmiter and actually removing an event emitter from the domain.
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes