Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Footer added #6830

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed

fix: Footer added #6830

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

Wellitsabhi
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Added Footer in 'Learn' and 'About' section

Validation

Screenshot_20240611_115955


Screenshot_20240611_115708

Related Issues

Fixes #6829

Check List

  • I have read the Contributing Guidelines and made commit messages that follow the guideline.
  • I have run npm run format to ensure the code follows the style guide.
  • I have run npm run test to check if all tests are passing.
  • I have run npx turbo build to check if the website builds without errors.
  • I've covered new added functionality with unit tests if necessary.

@Wellitsabhi Wellitsabhi requested a review from a team as a code owner June 11, 2024 06:33
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 11, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
nodejs-org ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Jun 21, 2024 6:38pm

@Wellitsabhi Wellitsabhi changed the title issue #6829 fixed fix: Footer added Jun 11, 2024
@AugustinMauroy AugustinMauroy added the github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks label Jun 11, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks label Jun 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 11, 2024

Lighthouse Results

URL Performance Accessibility Best Practices SEO Report
/en 🟢 99 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 91 🔗
/en/about 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 91 🔗
/en/about/previous-releases 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 92 🔗
/en/download 🟢 99 🟢 100 🟢 96 🟢 91 🔗
/en/blog 🟢 99 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 92 🔗

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 11, 2024

Unit Test Coverage Report

Lines Statements Branches Functions
Coverage: 92%
90.67% (593/654) 76.08% (175/230) 94.57% (122/129)

Unit Test Report

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
131 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 5.257s ⏱️

@AugustinMauroy
Copy link
Member

Ok good, but you need to do something ´cause actually the footer take to much place on mobile screen.

@Wellitsabhi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok , will add css for small screens only

Copy link
Collaborator

@bmuenzenmeyer bmuenzenmeyer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the footer should not be sticky - it should be the natural last item in the scrolled content

@Wellitsabhi
Copy link
Contributor Author

My finding is issue only persists where ArticleLayout comp is used.
For check - I inserted dummy data in /about , and was working fine , no sticky footer

WhatsApp.Video.2024-06-11.at.21.16.03.mp4

@Wellitsabhi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Wellitsabhi commented Jun 12, 2024

applied external css on <Withfooter/> ,
on small screen, it will appear above breadcrumb. otherwise working noramlly.
UI looks good too.

fix.footer.mp4

components/Containers/Footer/index.module.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
layouts/About.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Singh <99867024+Wellitsabhi@users.noreply.github.com>
@Wellitsabhi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Wellitsabhi commented Jun 17, 2024

@bmuenzenmeyer @abizek @canerakdas
Can you please review my latest commit to consider it for merge.
Let me know if it needs any changes.
Thanks.

@abizek
Copy link
Contributor

abizek commented Jun 19, 2024

LGTM

@ovflowd
Copy link
Member

ovflowd commented Jun 21, 2024

@bmuenzenmeyer I dismissed your review, but feel free to do a re-review 🙏

@ovflowd
Copy link
Member

ovflowd commented Jun 21, 2024

Hmmm, the footer is still sticky, and we don't really want that as it means the overall content available for the page itself is diminished...

@Wellitsabhi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ovflowd which layout will be good? (below)

  1. height- 100vh ( has better responsivity in medium devices too)
Node.js.About.Node.js.-.Google.Chrome.2024-06-22.09-31-12.mp4
  1. height -100%
Node.js.About.Node.js.-.Google.Chrome.2024-06-22.09-42-03.mp4

I hope it address sticky issue.

@bmuenzenmeyer
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR will need to be rebased or recreated now that #6850 merged.

@Wellitsabhi Wellitsabhi closed this Jul 9, 2024
@Wellitsabhi Wellitsabhi deleted the my-branch branch July 9, 2024 05:43
@Wellitsabhi
Copy link
Contributor Author

I shall create new PR.
But it would be great if someone can suggest which layout should i follow

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Footer missing on Learn layout
6 participants