Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 6, 2023. It is now read-only.

refactor(vite): enable strict type checking #6616

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 15, 2022
Merged

refactor(vite): enable strict type checking #6616

merged 4 commits into from
Aug 15, 2022

Conversation

antfu
Copy link
Member

@antfu antfu commented Aug 15, 2022

🔗 Linked issue

Follow up #6368

❓ Type of change

  • 📖 Documentation (updates to the documentation or readme)
  • 🐞 Bug fix (a non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • 👌 Enhancement (improving an existing functionality like performance)
  • ✨ New feature (a non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

📚 Description

📝 Checklist

  • I have linked an issue or discussion.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 15, 2022 •
edited
Loading

✅ Deploy Preview for nuxt3-docs canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 330e996
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/nuxt3-docs/deploys/62fa4b36341b4700085d636f

@antfu
Copy link
Member Author

antfu commented Aug 15, 2022

Type failed due to #6617

pi0
pi0 approved these changes Aug 15, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@pi0 pi0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks 🚀

@pi0 pi0 changed the title chore(vite): enable strict type checking refactor(vite): enable strict type checking Aug 15, 2022
@pi0 pi0 merged commit d2094ea into main Aug 15, 2022
@pi0 pi0 deleted the chore/strict-vite branch August 15, 2022 13:40
@pi0 pi0 mentioned this pull request Aug 26, 2022
Merged
@danielroe danielroe added the 3.x label Jan 19, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@pi0 pi0 pi0 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
3.x
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@antfu @pi0 @danielroe