Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate InstrumentationLibrary from metric.Descriptor #2197

Merged
merged 46 commits into from
Sep 27, 2021

Conversation

jmacd
Copy link
Contributor

@jmacd jmacd commented Aug 20, 2021

Please excuse a relatively large PR. I've made efforts to keep it easy-to-review as described below.

The problem being addressed is that the metric.Descriptor contains the instrumentation library name and version, which force consumers of the metric data to re-group metrics by instrumentation library.

One goal is to move the Descriptor type into the new metric/sdkapi sub-package, however that move will only create a larger PR so this PR leaves it in place and a future, simple PR will apply the move. We had to refactor this because the InstrumentOption and MeterOption types do not belong in sdkapi. Thus, NewDescriptor needed to lose those options.

The metric.NewDescriptor() function was problematic because it took both InstrumentOption and MeterOption, and our goal is to disentangle these. A few valid non-test uses of NewDescriptor are modified to manage the InstrumentOption values themselves, i.e., compute an InstrumentConfig and extract the two options (description and unit) manually. All the test-only uses of metric.NewDescriptor() are replaced by metrictest.NewDescriptor() with the old behavior (i.e., accepting varargs options for description and unit). This minimizes the size of this PR.

The metric Controller now maintains one Accumulator per instrumentation library, as opposed to one Accumulator per SDK. This changes the export path, giving it a two-level structure where the exporter sees one instrumentation library at a time, then can visit each export record.

The name CheckpointSet became problematic and was never a good name. "Checkpoint" is the write-oriented behavior that is carried out by the metric Processor; "Reader" is the read-oriented behavior carried out by the exporter. The existing CheckpointSet has been renamed Reader. A new type named InstrumentationLibraryReader is introduced to read one library at a time, which gives a two-level ForEach() style of iteration.

The Controller now takes a factory for building processors instead of a single processor, thus many constructors change from controller.New(processor.New(...), ...) to controller.New(processor.NewFactory(...), ...).

The real, functional changes in this PR are:

  1. in metric/registry a new *Provider type maintains a unique-map of Meter implementations, separate from the unique-map of instrument/kind that it already kept. The new *Provider wraps around an implementation of MeterProvider that is not required to maintain name-to-Meter uniqueness, whereas before this was encapsulated in a single unique map.
  2. in internal/metric/global a new *Provider type defers MeterProvider initialization explicitly, whereas before the uniqueness was implicitly managed by the registry
  3. in sdk/metric/controller/basic, now using the registry Provider, which exposes a List() method to access the registered instrumentation libraries, to export two-level information through the new InstrumentationLibraryReader. there is a slight change of lock semantics; whereas before the Controller used its one Accumulator's state as a lock to determine when refresh was needed, it now uses the same lock used to protect against multiple Start()/Stop() calls; no significant change of behavior here
  4. in exporters/otlp/otlpmetric/... the grouping by instrumentation library is removed; calls to source() and sink() are carried out once per instrumentation library.
  5. the metric SDK properly implements the instrumentation library SchemaURL field (and is tested)

A bit of test cleanup has been applied. There were a number of test-only implementations of the former CheckpointSet interface that were consolidated into helpers in sdk/metric/processor/processortest.

Part of #2090.
Fixes #2086.
Part of #2119.

File-by-file review notes (non-test files): #2197 (comment)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 20, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #2197 (6e984a5) into main (92551d3) will decrease coverage by 0.0%.
The diff coverage is 78.4%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main   #2197     +/-   ##
=======================================
- Coverage   72.5%   72.5%   -0.1%     
=======================================
  Files        168     168             
  Lines      11764   11872    +108     
=======================================
+ Hits        8535    8609     +74     
- Misses      2995    3029     +34     
  Partials     234     234             
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...rs/otlp/otlpmetric/internal/otlpmetrictest/data.go 0.0% <0.0%> (ø)
...tlp/otlpmetric/internal/otlpmetrictest/otlptest.go 0.0% <0.0%> (ø)
sdk/export/metric/metric.go 44.6% <ø> (ø)
sdk/metric/processor/basic/config.go 100.0% <ø> (ø)
metric/config.go 67.5% <16.6%> (-20.6%) ⬇️
exporters/prometheus/prometheus.go 65.2% <46.1%> (+<0.1%) ⬆️
sdk/metric/processor/processortest/test.go 85.5% <65.0%> (-6.0%) ⬇️
exporters/stdout/stdoutmetric/metric.go 76.2% <72.8%> (-1.9%) ⬇️
metric/metric.go 54.8% <77.7%> (-1.7%) ⬇️
internal/metric/registry/registry.go 86.8% <84.6%> (ø)
... and 12 more

@jmacd
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmacd commented Sep 2, 2021

@evantorrie please take a look?

Copy link
Contributor

@codeboten codeboten left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still working through the PR, just wanted to share the feedback so far

sdk/metric/processor/basic/basic_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sdk/metric/processor/basic/basic_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sdk/metric/processor/basic/basic_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sdk/metric/processor/basic/basic_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sdk/metric/processor/basic/basic_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sdk/resource/resource.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
exporters/otlp/otlpmetric/exporter.go Show resolved Hide resolved
exporters/otlp/otlpmetric/exporter.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
bridge/opencensus/exporter_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@evantorrie
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM.

Copy link
Contributor

@MadVikingGod MadVikingGod left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm happy with where it is, if you find you can remove the functions discussed above then 👍 to that too.

@jmacd
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmacd commented Sep 21, 2021

Please take a look at the sync.Map now used as the MeterProvider in sdk/metric/controller/basic/controllergo.

metric/metrictest/meter.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
metric/metrictest/meter.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
jmacd and others added 3 commits September 23, 2021 12:16
@jmacd
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmacd commented Sep 23, 2021

This is ready to merge, I think. Thanks all for your patience.

@jmacd
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmacd commented Sep 24, 2021

@MadVikingGod I reverted two commits that changed the controller to use a sync.Map behind its MeterProvider implementation. This can be addressed in a future PR. I've left a TODO about it, the spec will require this sort of improvement. I propose any further changes to this PR be left as TODOs, but I think it's ready to merge as-is.

@MadVikingGod
Copy link
Contributor

I have talked with @jmacd offline about this, and agree that the sync.Map code is better off as an improvement in a later PR. Count this as reapproving this from me.

@MrAlias MrAlias merged commit 3c8e185 into open-telemetry:main Sep 27, 2021
@jmacd
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmacd commented Sep 27, 2021

Thank you, approvers & maintainers. This was a tough one, I appreciate your patience. 🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Metrics: create independent MeterProvider
7 participants