You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After the work done to support multiple image versions for each OOTB Notebook image, we've begun showing image version "names" to the end user. RHODS-7908 aimed to streamline the naming convention into 2 for the 1.26 release (20XX.1 and 1.2) with the goal of moving to a single naming convention in the next OOTB update (i.e. 20XX.1, 20XX.2).
However, two Notebook images (CUDA and Tensorflow) still show a different version name, which includes the CUDA version. My suggestion is to put the CUDA version in the "description"/"subtitle" of the image itself rather than the version name in order to achieve the single naming convention that was agreed upon.
Issue: RHODS 8215
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
After the work done to support multiple image versions for each OOTB Notebook image, we've begun showing image version "names" to the end user. RHODS-7908 aimed to streamline the naming convention into 2 for the 1.26 release (20XX.1 and 1.2) with the goal of moving to a single naming convention in the next OOTB update (i.e. 20XX.1, 20XX.2).
However, two Notebook images (CUDA and Tensorflow) still show a different version name, which includes the CUDA version. My suggestion is to put the CUDA version in the "description"/"subtitle" of the image itself rather than the version name in order to achieve the single naming convention that was agreed upon.
Issue: RHODS 8215
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: