Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 6, 2020. It is now read-only.

Make sure to not mark block header hash as invalid if only the body is wrong. #11356

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 30, 2019
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 13 additions & 1 deletion ethcore/src/verification/queue/kind.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -27,9 +27,12 @@ pub use self::headers::Headers;

/// Something which can produce a hash and a parent hash.
pub trait BlockLike {
/// Get the hash of this item.
/// Get the hash of this item - i.e. the header hash.
fn hash(&self) -> H256;

/// Get a raw hash of this item - i.e. the hash of the RLP representation.
fn raw_hash(&self) -> H256;

/// Get the hash of this item's parent.
fn parent_hash(&self) -> H256;

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -160,6 +163,10 @@ pub mod blocks {
self.header.hash()
}

fn raw_hash(&self) -> H256 {
hash::keccak(&self.bytes)
}

fn parent_hash(&self) -> H256 {
self.header.parent_hash().clone()
}
Expand All @@ -174,6 +181,10 @@ pub mod blocks {
self.header.hash()
}

fn raw_hash(&self) -> H256 {
hash::keccak(&self.bytes)
}

fn parent_hash(&self) -> H256 {
self.header.parent_hash().clone()
}
Expand All @@ -197,6 +208,7 @@ pub mod headers {

impl BlockLike for Header {
fn hash(&self) -> H256 { self.hash() }
fn raw_hash(&self) -> H256 { self.hash() }
fn parent_hash(&self) -> H256 { self.parent_hash().clone() }
fn difficulty(&self) -> U256 { self.difficulty().clone() }
}
Expand Down
13 changes: 12 additions & 1 deletion ethcore/src/verification/queue/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -472,13 +472,14 @@ impl<K: Kind> VerificationQueue<K> {
/// Add a block to the queue.
pub fn import(&self, input: K::Input) -> Result<H256, (K::Input, Error)> {
let hash = input.hash();
let raw_hash = input.raw_hash();
{
if self.processing.read().contains_key(&hash) {
bail!((input, ErrorKind::Import(ImportErrorKind::AlreadyQueued).into()));
}

let mut bad = self.verification.bad.lock();
if bad.contains(&hash) {
if bad.contains(&hash) || bad.contains(&raw_hash) {
bail!((input, ErrorKind::Import(ImportErrorKind::KnownBad).into()));
}

Expand All @@ -505,6 +506,16 @@ impl<K: Kind> VerificationQueue<K> {
match err {
// Don't mark future blocks as bad.
Error(ErrorKind::Block(BlockError::TemporarilyInvalid(_)), _) => {},
// If the transaction root or uncles hash is invalid, it doesn't necessarily mean
// that the header is invalid. We might have just received a malformed block body,
// so we shouldn't put the header hash to `bad`.
//
// We still put the entire `Item` hash to bad, so that we can early reject
// the items that are malformed.
Error(ErrorKind::Block(BlockError::InvalidTransactionsRoot(_)), _) |
Error(ErrorKind::Block(BlockError::InvalidUnclesHash(_)), _) => {
sorpaas marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
self.verification.bad.lock().insert(raw_hash);
},
_ => {
self.verification.bad.lock().insert(hash);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tomusdrw I'm thinking maybe it's better to always track bad blocks by raw_hash?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it may require either putting both hashes in or changing some sync code as we expose status(H256) -> Status method, so that other components can check by-hash if particular header was already marked as bad.
I didn't want to change too much in that PR, but I think it may indeed make sense long term.

}
Expand Down