-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modernize and consolidate JDKs usage across all stages of the build. Update JDK-14 requirement, switch to JDK-17 instead #1368
Changes from 1 commit
e18dbd8
f55b0ea
fe6157f
4349dbf
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Fork [opensearch-project/OpenSearch](https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenS | |
|
||
OpenSearch builds using Java 11 at a minimum. This means you must have a JDK 11 installed with the environment variable `JAVA_HOME` referencing the path to Java home for your JDK 11 installation, e.g. `JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/jdk-11`. | ||
|
||
By default, tests use the same runtime as `JAVA_HOME`. However, since OpenSearch also supports JDK 8 as the runtime, the build supports compiling with JDK 11 and testing on a different version of JDK runtime. To do this, set `RUNTIME_JAVA_HOME` pointing to the Java home of another JDK installation, e.g. `RUNTIME_JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/jdk-8`. | ||
By default, the test tasks use bundled JDK runtime, configured in `buildSrc/version.properties` and set to JDK 17 (LTS). Other kind of test tasks (integration, cluster, ... ) use the same runtime as `JAVA_HOME`. However, since OpenSearch supports JDK 8/17 as the runtime, the build supports compiling with JDK 11 and testing on a different version of JDK runtime. To do this, set `RUNTIME_JAVA_HOME` pointing to the Java home of another JDK installation, e.g. `RUNTIME_JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/jdk-8`. Alernatively, the runtime JDK version could be provided as the command line argument, using combination of `runtime.java=<major JDK version>` property and `JAVA<major JDK version>_HOME` environment variable, for exampe `./gradlew -Druntime.java=17 ...` (in this case, the tooling expects `JAVA17_HOME` environment variable to be set). | ||
|
||
To run the full suite of tests you will also need `JAVA8_HOME`, `JAVA11_HOME`, and `JAVA14_HOME`. They are required by the [backwards compatibility test](./TESTING.md#testing-backwards-compatibility). | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah, JAVA14_HOME is only used for building OpenSearch 1.0, it's a compromise for the smooth transition with Elasticsearch 7.10.2 🙂. |
||
|
||
|
@@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ Start by running the test suite with `gradlew check`. This should complete witho | |
OpenSearch Build Hamster says Hello! | ||
Gradle Version : 6.6.1 | ||
OS Info : Linux 5.4.0-1037-aws (amd64) | ||
JDK Version : 14 (JDK) | ||
JAVA_HOME : /usr/lib/jvm/java-14-openjdk-amd64 | ||
JDK Version : 11 (JDK) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Since we lowered it to |
||
JAVA_HOME : /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64 | ||
======================================= | ||
|
||
... | ||
|
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ Use `-Dtests.opensearch.` to pass additional settings to the running instance. F | |
|
||
### IntelliJ IDEA | ||
|
||
When importing into IntelliJ you will need to define an appropriate JDK. The convention is that **this SDK should be named "14"**, and the project import will detect it automatically. For more details on defining an SDK in IntelliJ please refer to [this documentation](https://www.jetbrains.com/help/idea/sdk.html#define-sdk). Note that SDK definitions are global, so you can add the JDK from any project, or after project import. Importing with a missing JDK will still work, IntelliJ will report a problem and will refuse to build until resolved. | ||
When importing into IntelliJ you will need to define an appropriate JDK. The convention is that **this SDK should be named "11"**, and the project import will detect it automatically. For more details on defining an SDK in IntelliJ please refer to [this documentation](https://www.jetbrains.com/help/idea/sdk.html#define-sdk). Note that SDK definitions are global, so you can add the JDK from any project, or after project import. Importing with a missing JDK will still work, IntelliJ will report a problem and will refuse to build until resolved. | ||
|
||
You can import the OpenSearch project into IntelliJ IDEA as follows. | ||
|
||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -27,6 +27,6 @@ | |
# specific language governing permissions and limitations | ||
# under the License. | ||
# | ||
OPENSEARCH_BUILD_JAVA=openjdk14 | ||
OPENSEARCH_RUNTIME_JAVA=openjdk14 | ||
OPENSEARCH_BUILD_JAVA=openjdk17 | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @dblock should we lower it to
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, we should! There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 👍 |
||
OPENSEARCH_RUNTIME_JAVA=openjdk17 | ||
GRADLE_TASK=build |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Andriy, a little concern regarding the expression "OpenSearch supports JDK 8/17 as the runtime". 😄
My concern is if listing 2 JDK versions, will it mislead the readers that only the 2 versions are supported? Actually other versions are able to use as runtime.
In my opinion, the original expression "However, since OpenSearch supports JDK 8 as the runtime" aims to emphasize the lowest JDK version for the runtime.
It's fine if there is actually no ambiguity on this expression.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Absolutely agree, changing the phrasing, thank you
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! While the original expression might also have a little confusion - whether only JDK 8 is supported as the runtime. 😂 Haha, anyway, a good solution might be to put the supporting matrix of OpenSearch and JVM in somewhere in user's documentation, but it's out of scope.
Glad to see you improving the developer guide!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @tlfeng , I think the build matrix is the goal, hopefully we will get there soon, discussion is ongoing in opensearch-project/opensearch-build#732
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for providing the link 😄 (seems there are many GitHub issues regarding the JDK versions). I will keep an eye on the discussion.