Communication mechanism for js #289
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@ | ||
| /* | ||
| * Copyright OpenSearch Contributors | ||
| * SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 | ||
| * | ||
| * The OpenSearch Contributors require contributions made to | ||
| * this file be licensed under the Apache-2.0 license or a | ||
| * compatible open source license. | ||
| */ | ||
| package org.opensearch.jobscheduler.model; | ||
|
|
||
| import org.opensearch.common.xcontent.ToXContent; | ||
| import org.opensearch.common.xcontent.ToXContentObject; | ||
| import org.opensearch.common.xcontent.XContentBuilder; | ||
| import org.opensearch.common.xcontent.XContentParser; | ||
|
|
||
| import java.io.IOException; | ||
| import java.util.Objects; | ||
|
|
||
| import static org.opensearch.common.xcontent.XContentParserUtils.ensureExpectedToken; | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * This model class stores the job details of the extension. | ||
| */ | ||
| public class JobDetails implements ToXContentObject { | ||
joshpalis marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * jobIndex from the extension. | ||
| */ | ||
| private String jobIndex; | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * jobType from the extension. | ||
| */ | ||
| private String jobType; | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * jobParser action to trigger the response back to the extension. | ||
| */ | ||
| private String jobParameterAction; | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * jobRunner action to trigger the response back to the extension. | ||
| */ | ||
| private String jobRunnerAction; | ||
|
|
||
| public static final String JOB_INDEX = "job_index"; | ||
| public static final String JOB_TYPE = "job_type"; | ||
| public static final String JOB_PARAMETER_ACTION = "job_parser_action"; | ||
| public static final String JOB_RUNNER_ACTION = "job_runner_action"; | ||
|
|
||
| public JobDetails() {} | ||
|
|
||
| public JobDetails(String jobIndex, String jobType, String jobParameterAction, String jobRunnerAction) { | ||
| this.jobIndex = jobIndex; | ||
| this.jobType = jobType; | ||
| this.jobParameterAction = jobParameterAction; | ||
| this.jobRunnerAction = jobRunnerAction; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Override | ||
| public XContentBuilder toXContent(XContentBuilder builder, ToXContent.Params params) throws IOException { | ||
| XContentBuilder xContentBuilder = builder.startObject(); | ||
| if (jobIndex != null) { | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Trying to understand, a. do we need to check if they are null? There was a problem hiding this comment. yes we do have to check if they are null or not as while testing if we provide no value then it should handle that test case gracefully. There was a problem hiding this comment. When the api call will be made then the job index will never be null. |
||
| xContentBuilder.field(JOB_INDEX, jobIndex); | ||
| } | ||
| if (jobType != null) { | ||
| xContentBuilder.field(JOB_TYPE, jobType); | ||
| } | ||
| if (jobParameterAction != null) { | ||
| xContentBuilder.field(JOB_PARAMETER_ACTION, jobParameterAction); | ||
| } | ||
| if (jobRunnerAction != null) { | ||
| xContentBuilder.field(JOB_RUNNER_ACTION, jobRunnerAction); | ||
| } | ||
| return xContentBuilder.endObject(); | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Nulls are dangerous and usually best avoided. Personal preference is to try to use Looking at all the classes in this PR, it seems that we always require
|
||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public static JobDetails parse(XContentParser parser) throws IOException { | ||
| String jobIndex = null; | ||
| String jobType = null; | ||
| String jobParameterAction = null; | ||
| String jobRunnerAction = null; | ||
|
|
||
| ensureExpectedToken(XContentParser.Token.START_OBJECT, parser.currentToken(), parser); | ||
|
|
||
| while (parser.nextToken() != XContentParser.Token.END_OBJECT) { | ||
| String fieldName = parser.currentName(); | ||
| parser.nextToken(); | ||
| switch (fieldName) { | ||
| case JOB_INDEX: | ||
| jobIndex = parser.text(); | ||
| break; | ||
| case JOB_TYPE: | ||
| jobType = parser.text(); | ||
| break; | ||
| case JOB_PARAMETER_ACTION: | ||
| jobParameterAction = parser.text(); | ||
| break; | ||
| case JOB_RUNNER_ACTION: | ||
| jobRunnerAction = parser.text(); | ||
| break; | ||
| default: | ||
| parser.skipChildren(); | ||
| break; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return new JobDetails(jobIndex, jobType, jobParameterAction, jobRunnerAction); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public JobDetails(final JobDetails copyJobDetails) { | ||
| this(copyJobDetails.jobIndex, copyJobDetails.jobType, copyJobDetails.jobParameterAction, copyJobDetails.jobRunnerAction); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public String getJobIndex() { | ||
| return jobIndex; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public void setJobIndex(String jobIndex) { | ||
| this.jobIndex = jobIndex; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public String getJobType() { | ||
| return jobType; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public void setJobType(String jobType) { | ||
| this.jobType = jobType; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public String getJobParameterAction() { | ||
| return jobParameterAction; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public void setJobParameterAction(String jobParameterAction) { | ||
| this.jobParameterAction = jobParameterAction; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public String getJobRunnerAction() { | ||
| return jobRunnerAction; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public void setJobRunnerAction(String jobRunnerAction) { | ||
| this.jobRunnerAction = jobRunnerAction; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Override | ||
| public boolean equals(Object o) { | ||
| if (this == o) return true; | ||
| if (o == null || getClass() != o.getClass()) return false; | ||
| JobDetails that = (JobDetails) o; | ||
| return Objects.equals(jobIndex, that.jobIndex) | ||
| && Objects.equals(jobType, that.jobType) | ||
| && Objects.equals(jobParameterAction, that.jobParameterAction) | ||
| && Objects.equals(jobRunnerAction, that.jobRunnerAction); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Override | ||
| public int hashCode() { | ||
| return Objects.hash(jobIndex, jobType, jobParameterAction, jobRunnerAction); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Override | ||
| public String toString() { | ||
| return "JobDetails{" | ||
| + "jobIndex='" | ||
| + jobIndex | ||
| + '\'' | ||
| + ", jobType='" | ||
| + jobType | ||
| + '\'' | ||
| + ", jobParameterAction='" | ||
| + jobParameterAction | ||
| + '\'' | ||
| + ", jobRunnerAction='" | ||
| + jobRunnerAction | ||
| + '\'' | ||
| + '}'; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(Style) Something about hardcoding a port here seems off to me, but I'm not sure what a better choice is. So probably ok.