Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kubevirt: port VM list to PF4 Table #1758

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 26, 2019

Conversation

atiratree
Copy link
Member

@atiratree atiratree commented Jun 19, 2019

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jun 19, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @suomiy. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 19, 2019
@mareklibra
Copy link
Contributor

mareklibra commented Jun 19, 2019

@suomiy , I think this is better to stack on #1689 or at least #1682

@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@
"@console/internal": "0.0.0-fixed",
"@console/plugin-sdk": "0.0.0-fixed",
"@console/shared": "0.0.0-fixed",
"kubevirt-web-ui-components": "~0.1.35"
"kubevirt-web-ui-components": "~0.1.35",
"kubevirt-typescript-api": "^0.18.1-rc"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@suomiy , can you please provide reasoning behind this new project/dependency?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as said in #1731, this is to add TS definitions of kubevirt objects

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we do it without adding this dependency and maybe revisit it later ? It will just slow down merging the PRs and we dont really have a time to waste.

@atiratree
Copy link
Member Author

@suomiy , I think this is better to stack on #1689 or at least #1682

this depends on #1682 or #1739 (whichever comes first)

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 19, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 19, 2019
@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.2 milestone Jun 19, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 19, 2019
@mareklibra
Copy link
Contributor

Please note, #1682 is merged now.
I like the idea of generating typescript based on API, esp. to deal with complexity and conformity. Moreover the API is changing over-time, we are i.e. close to v1.

However, the project should become official part of kubevirt first, imo.

As @rawagner wrote, we need to concentrate on 4.2 features as the top priority now and introduction of a similar dependency sounds like splitting of our effort. I think it's more safe to re-evaluate in post-4.2 timeframe.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 20, 2019
@atiratree
Copy link
Member Author

Please note, #1682 is merged now.
I like the idea of generating typescript based on API, esp. to deal with complexity and conformity. Moreover the API is changing over-time, we are i.e. close to v1.

However, the project should become official part of kubevirt first, imo.

As @rawagner wrote, we need to concentrate on 4.2 features as the top priority now and introduction of a similar dependency sounds like splitting of our effort. I think it's more safe to re-evaluate in post-4.2 timeframe.

It depends. It can be quite fast if we move it to console repo. Moved the discussion to #1773

@atiratree
Copy link
Member Author

removed dependency on the types (#1773)

@jelkosz
Copy link

jelkosz commented Jun 26, 2019

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jun 26, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 26, 2019
@atiratree
Copy link
Member Author

fixed

@rawagner
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 26, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rawagner, suomiy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 4f68117 into openshift:master Jun 26, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants